Talk:Coinspinner
 | The contents of the Coinspinner page were merged into Twelve Swords of Power. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Coinspinner. The result was to merge it. dbenbenn | talk 02:29, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This article has been moved to Twelve Swords of Power#Coinspinner. This should be made into a redirect to that location when the VfD shakes out.Akerkhof 04:41, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Dood? Mind if I assist with the spelling? Weaponofmassinstruction 05:40, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- That wasn't too bad at all! Best of luck with VfD! Weaponofmassinstruction 05:51, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Hey thanks! I appreciate the support and the editing. I'm thinking in response the the criticism to move all the sword entries into one page under Twelve Swords of Power or something like that, and redirecting all sword entries there. Akerkhof 15:29, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Might be a good way to go.... give one article a lot of meat,.... mark it as a stub rhough, and leave a note on the talk page that you are in the process of completing it. Weaponofmassinstruction 03:54, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- What do you think of the article so far? I've only got soulcutter and wayfinder left to go. By the way, thanks for the edits, the first draft I made while I was sick and bored, and I kind of lost the "encyclopedic" tone of things. I've tried to pay more attention to turning "you"s to "one"s, and keeping the tenses straight. I think these types of articles are far more entertaining if they are kept to the "clinical" or "scholarly" style.
- I like it, the merge does make sense. But, it is 11pm and I'm terribly over-hung... I'll fine tooth it later, see if I can be of any help.Weaponofmassinstruction 05:15, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- What do you think of the article so far? I've only got soulcutter and wayfinder left to go. By the way, thanks for the edits, the first draft I made while I was sick and bored, and I kind of lost the "encyclopedic" tone of things. I've tried to pay more attention to turning "you"s to "one"s, and keeping the tenses straight. I think these types of articles are far more entertaining if they are kept to the "clinical" or "scholarly" style.
- Might be a good way to go.... give one article a lot of meat,.... mark it as a stub rhough, and leave a note on the talk page that you are in the process of completing it. Weaponofmassinstruction 03:54, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)