Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acquisition Process (ISPL)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - redirected - SimonP 19:02, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Acquisition Process (ISPL)[edit]
Marked for deletion but never listed. The current text of the article is "All information in this entry has been moved to the entry on ISPL to prevent fragmentation." No vote. --Dmcdevit 00:48, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to ISPL. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:52, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect. Rossami (talk) 00:52, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to ISPL. Did we really need a vote on this? Andrewa 01:14, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- "Please do not remove or deface this notice or blank, merge, or move this article", what else would we have done? --Dmcdevit 01:53, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Why not simply redirect? Despite what the notice said, it wasn't listed on VfD. Nobody seems to think it's a candidate for deletion except maybe the newbie who started listing it and didn't complete the process. AFAIK there's no policy that says in these circumstances you must complete the listing process, rather than reverting it. No change of vote. Andrewa 15:05, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I hope you don't think I'm voting to delete, because I'm not. I just figured since it said not too remove the tag, I would finish by listing it here. And not taking part in the vote; I am certainly not convinced it should be deleted. Anyway, this probably could be closed early... --Dmcdevit 22:11, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Agree it could close early. Understand you aren't voting to delete. That's my whole point. Nobody wants this page deleted, not even the newbie who neither understood the process nor completed the nomination. The only time you need to list something on VfD is when you want to request sysop action to delete a page. That's what VfD is here for. No change of vote. Andrewa 01:21, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I hope you don't think I'm voting to delete, because I'm not. I just figured since it said not too remove the tag, I would finish by listing it here. And not taking part in the vote; I am certainly not convinced it should be deleted. Anyway, this probably could be closed early... --Dmcdevit 22:11, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Why not simply redirect? Despite what the notice said, it wasn't listed on VfD. Nobody seems to think it's a candidate for deletion except maybe the newbie who started listing it and didn't complete the process. AFAIK there's no policy that says in these circumstances you must complete the listing process, rather than reverting it. No change of vote. Andrewa 15:05, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- "Please do not remove or deface this notice or blank, merge, or move this article", what else would we have done? --Dmcdevit 01:53, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.