User talk:Tarek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An empty talk page? Well, not anymore. Good gynae edits there, Tarek. What's your field? JFW | T@lk 19:42, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Hey JFW! Thank you for your comment. I am a lowly student, but my edits are on account of the fact I have a Reproductive system exam on Monday.. Monday night, I will switch specialties to GI : ) When I grow up, though, I want to be an ER doc. As a note, most of this is "cleaning up and porting" wiki articles on the wiki I use to study, aka IKE. The problem is that with the speed we receive information in school, it's hard to ensure that it's all concise, clean and FDL-able. Any advice? Also, I noticed that you're part of WikiProject "Clinical medicine". How may I become more informed and contribute to it? Tarek 20:06, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Read through it and add your name. You're very welcome + have fun! JFW | T@lk 22:56, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Spinal Cord Injury[edit]

Hello, Tarek, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for fixing the typos on spinal cord injury. I created that article while fulfilling some requests, but I don't have time to maintain or expand it all that much. It could use a good home, if you would like to adopt it. -- ClockworkSoul 04:25, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Hey Soul! Thank you for your kind words. I'm not sure what 'adoption' entails, but I wouldn't mind watching over the article and trying to expand it, though I am seriously overextended as is.. Tarek 00:02, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Yes, that looks fine. It was a minor complaint anyhow. I must compliment you on cleaning up such a touchy article. It's been stable for weeks now whereas it was formerly a living edit war. I still think the title is troubling, but anyone who bothers to read the article should see it's NPOV. If I have any ideas I'll be sure to post them. Cool Hand Luke 08:55, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

You mistook my words ,Zain[edit]

Assallam-o-Allaikum,

you mistook my words of Alleged. Please see the earlier version before my changes. They removed the list all together. So I gave it a temporary name. So they can't use the NPOV issue and remove the list altogether.

Expecting to remain in touch with you.

Thanks

Zain 10:33, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I never wanted pic on the page. It was because of 'Abdel Qadir' (who some say is sock puppet of sock puppets orignally alberuni). He attempted to put a pic on talk he was rejected. i just helped him to make his case for putting it on the talk page. That's all . And the pic which he orignally put was not the one he put later that was not a vomiting type pic. See the talk history of that page.


Zain 20:37, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

VfD[edit]

The current status is that the pages are awaiting transwikiing to WikiSource. It was my judgment that there was not a consensus to keep the material at Wikipedia itself, but that there was a consensus to retain the material, thus the move to Wikisource. I don't know when that will be carried out, but the material will still be available. It looks like the talk pages were restored--I had goofed earlier and miscounted the transwiki votes. Mackensen (talk) 01:18, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Please have mercy on my soul and put the page at its final resting place before List of Palestinian children killed by Israelis in 2004 gets any more obscene! Tarek 01:45, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I did get your message on this matter, and I'm forced to conclude politics yeilded different outcomes. Several delete voters on the Palestinian children VfD were AWOL on the terrorism VfD which should have rightly been transwikied/deleted/whatever for precisely the same reasons. In fact, as Dr Zen pointed out, the terrorism pages were even more likely to be POV due to the murky definition of the list as opposed to the relatively straightforward "Palestinian children killed by Israelis". Cool Hand Luke 21:46, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

3 revert rule[edit]

You've violated the Wikipedia:3 revert rule. If you revert List of Palestinian children killed by Israelis in 2004 again, you may be temporarily blocked from editing. Thanks, ugen64 02:39, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Spondilolisthesis[edit]

Hi there: I have removed your redirect on this subject to slipped disc, which it is not, and have written a reasonable length article on the topic.--Anthony.bradbury 22:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can[edit]

Possibly unfree Image:Red_eye.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded from stock.xchng or altered, Image:Red_eye.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images#SXC_images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OrphanBot 03:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

03:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back to Wikipedia[edit]

Looking forwards to collaborating. I see you have meet JFW above. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:05, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've been lurking since, but you're right.. About to get busy here! Tarek (talk) 15:11, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Social exclusion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Al-Shifa Hospital, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Akhbar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Tarek. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Tarek. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Tarek. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Tarek. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]