User talk:Bacchiad

Ceqli

We know you supported the Ceqli language. Help us save it by voting to undelete -- it's now up at Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion. Thanks! 24.4.127.164 02:32, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Just a question really

1. You disappeared when CheeseDreams was most active [1]
2. You had knowledge about CheeseDreams' RfAr
3. You asked CheeseDreams to edit an article
4. You asked Grunt to ban CheeseDreams for doing so

I didn't ask you to revert my first edit. I didn't ask you to muck around in The Jesus Mysteries. Bacchiad 06:07, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

So, whose sock puppet are you? CheeseDreams 00:15, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

P.s. I can see what your POV editing is about - [2]

It's true. I'm a Mithraic and/or Zoroastrian fundamentalist. Bacchiad 06:07, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

That edit doesn't look like you are pushing that POV, more like a Christian POV pusher to me. CheeseDreams 04:04, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

(copying to CheeseDreams talk page) This is the second time I've seen you imply that someone is a sockpuppet. The first time you did it for me. I count this as harassment. Will you please stop? - Ta bu shi da yu 05:57, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

No.

Alien language

Very nice save on alien language! I changed my vote but I suggest you save the source of the page in case not enough people follow suit, and then you can just re-post it and I highly doubt anyone will object. — Ливай | ☺ 20:52, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Comunleng

Arrghhh! People are voting to delete Comunleng! Yes, Comunleng! Come and save it at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Comunleng 24.4.127.164 11:48, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

I see that you have voted keep on this article. Could you please therefore provide some external sources that aren't other Wikipedias (as these neither have external sources) to show that this isn't just Original Research that has been translated from the Spanish Wikipedia. Evil Monkey∴Hello 21:09, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)

You are receiving this notice due to a consideration that has come up during a VFD for the article Comunleng. As there was no clear consensus in Comunleng's previous VfD, it has been nominated again. Please see Votes for deletion/Comunleng 2 for comments. The Literate Engineer 01:10, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

Looking for articles to work on?

Hello, Bacchiad. I'm SuggestBot, a Wikipedia bot that helps new members contribute to Wikipedia. You might like to edit these articles I picked for you based on things you've edited in the past. Check it out -- I hope you find it useful. -- SuggestBot 14:41, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Race game

A tag has been placed on Race game, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Rjd0060 03:12, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Race game

Race game, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Race game satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race game and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Race game during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Rjd0060 03:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Rave

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Rave, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sandstein 05:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Deletion review

You recently commented on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychiatric abuse, which was closed as delete. The article has been nominated for a deletion review at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 October 5#Psychiatric abuse. Please feel free to comment on the decision there - as a contributor to the original AfD, your input would be welcomed. -- ChrisO 09:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Cosmic Wimpout

I have nominated Cosmic Wimpout, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmic Wimpout. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 23:03, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of fictional future events

You commented in the last Article for deletion discussion. This article is up for deletion again.

You are welcome to comment about the discussion for deletion. Ikip 19:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of L-Ron

The article L-Ron has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 13:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Your current article cleanups

Hi, I see that you are cleaning up articles by removing old tags from them. That's fine if the templates no longer apply.

However, some of your cleanups have raised some concern with me, as you replaced established articles with redirects to other articles. In some cases you merged a fraction of the merged article's content into the new article, in other cases you did not merge any contents at all. While the quality of some of the articles where you did this can certainly be improved, I'd like to ask you to stop boldly redirecting existing articles and/or merging them without prior community discussion raised on their corresponding talk pages (in particular at the current rate and with no or very little time spent by you on the careful evaluation and optimization of the article's contents). If you think, articles should be merged, the proper way to deal with it is to start a discussion on the corresponding talk page and wait for the opinion of other editors as well. Thanks.

I have therefore reverted some of your recent edits, when they occured just too bold, fast, or questionable to me. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 04:02, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Blanket order (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Supplier

Charles L. Perkins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chief Scientist

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tavola Ritonda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

a five pointed abomination

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		for this note on the barnstar project talk page. ElijahBosley (talk ☞) 17:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Question about templates

Hello, I was curious if you remembered why you'd created {{Roman myth (trade)}}, {{Roman myth (minor)}}, and {{Roman myth (rustic)}} separately instead of having one template? I'm thinking of suggesting that they be merged. Nyttend (talk) 18:59, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks; I figured you wouldn't remember (how many little things do I remember from eight years ago?), but I wanted to make sure. I'll be going to WP:TFD soon to get input on a merger — I see no reason not to merge, but others might see a good reason for keeping them as is. Nyttend (talk) 05:06, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 January 10. Nyttend (talk) 15:18, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Please self-revert your CMT Grant quote

The Grant quote you reverted to is clearly out of date--by everyone's consensus. If you think it is true today, then please explain your position on the CMT talk page. Otherwise, please self-revert this false statement back out of the article.Renejs (talk) 01:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Jesus wept. Bacchiad (talk) 02:32, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

JSTOR cleanup drive

Hello TWL users! We hope JSTOR has been a useful resource for your work. We're organizing a cleanup drive to correct dead links to JSTOR articles – these require JSTOR access and cannot easily be corrected by bot. We'd love for you to jump in and help out!

See the list

Sent of behalf of Nikkimaria for The Wikipedia Library's JSTOR using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bacchiad. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Roman myth

Template:Roman myth has been nominated for merging with Template:Roman religion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 18:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Roman religion

Template:Roman religion has been nominated for merging with Template:Roman religion (festival). You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 18:36, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Roman religion

Template:Roman religion has been nominated for merging with Template:Roman myth (mortal). You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 18:36, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Roman religion

Template:Roman religion has been nominated for merging with Template:Roman myth. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 18:36, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Roman religion

Template:Roman religion has been nominated for merging with Template:Ancient Roman religion horizontal. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 18:36, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Roman religion

Template:Roman religion has been nominated for merging with Template:Pontifices Maximi. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 18:36, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Greek myth (Titan)

Template:Greek myth (Titan) has been nominated for merging with Template:Greek myth (titan-concept). You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 09:37, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Apokolips

The article Apokolips has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Genesis

The article New Genesis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of New Genesis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Genesis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Genesis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Apokolips for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apokolips is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apokolips until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:06, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Kalibak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kalibak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalibak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TTN (talk) 21:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of L-Ron for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article L-Ron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L-Ron until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TTN (talk) 14:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)