Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert, Prince of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 05:07, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Albert, Prince of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha[edit]

Delete this article is full of lies. basically some vanity trying to style himself like Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, please see relevant discussion on Talk:Albert, Prince of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha Stancel 22:51, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - patent bullsh*t - and not even very clever --Doc Glasgow 23:29, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- btw when you kill off Albert,please also execute his brother Douglas, Prince of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha--Doc Glasgow 23:42, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect both to their proper articles. With honorifics, one never knows how a user is going to search or an author phrase it in a link text. If those redirects are ever turned back into this BS, we can protect them after reversion. Geogre 02:04, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. And just delete Douglas, Prince of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. --Angr/_comhrá 06:58, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Crap, but will probably be rescued by the fact that it is palpable petit treason, and therefore very much to the republican taste of much of the globe. Has no in-links, and its out-link to Prince Edward is a falsity. But I suspect it will still be here when next I look --Cynical Cursitor 07:12, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, Douglas appears (at this daydatetime) an empty shell. Perhaps he's emigrated, anticipating a cull, and planning to return later --Simon Cursitor 07:14, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both - Looks like yet another dubious would-be-pretenders with the usual proliferation of dubious titles. - Skysmith 08:07, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha which is the primary name of the article on Queen Victoria's husband. PatGallacher 11:04, 2005 May 20 (UTC)
Delete gibberish but keep as a potentially useful (and in any event, harmless) redirect to the real article. 23skidoo 13:08, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is palpably false. This article could be replaced with a redirect to the real Prince Albert. There is no such replacement for Douglas, though. Delete him, too. AlexTiefling 14:23, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete patent nonsense. Redirect perfectly good title to Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. -Willmcw 16:02, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
Redirect to Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. Even if this article were true, this person would not be notable. Wikipedia is not the Almanach de Gotha. Martg76 17:01, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, then recreate as a redirect. Non-standard, but useful. James F. (talk) 20:47, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.