Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armchair Position

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mackensen (talk) 22:59, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Armchair Position

This page has returned --Bedel23 July 4, 2005 07:21 (UTC)

I've changed the template to {{deleteagain}}. Naturenet | Talk 4 July 2005 07:30 (UTC)

Too bad this kind of rubbish is not speedy deletable. Not that I'm a prude - it's that the writing is so pathetic. Denni☯ 23:34, 2005 May 30 (UTC)

• Cleanup or Delete and let the redlink in list of sex positions stand. Uncle G 04:27, 2005 May 31 (UTC)
• Cleanup or Delete as per Uncle G. There could one day be a good article there but this isn't it. DoubleBlue (Talk) 04:34, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not encyclopaedic as is. Megan1967 10:33, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I've cleaned it up a little to make it more encyclopaedic, please re-vote. (Anonymous) 22:59, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for above reasons. Vegaswikian 05:32, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not an encyclopedia article. JamesBurns 09:34, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.