Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enright
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep the rewritten version.
Comment: I'm afraid that I have to disagree with BM. The original version, while deletable, was not so bad that it required deletion from the edit history (as, for example, a copyvio would). The correction to make this a good article should be encouraged. Rossami (talk) 06:15, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Enright[edit]
Neologism that doesn't google. Radiant! 12:59, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Does not appear in the English slang and colloquialisms used in the United Kingdom dictionary. HyperZonktalk 16:51, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete the nonsense that's here now, and replace it with a disambig page between Olwyn Enright, Derek Enright, D. J. Enright, and any other notable Enrights. Raven42 23:21, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Name Disambiguation Articles R Us Uncle G 01:40, 2005 Feb 25 (UTC)
- It's now a name disambig, as it should be - David Gerard 12:51, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. Again, I'll note that Uncle G should stop doing this. All he has to do is wait 5 days until the article originally submitted to VfD is deleted before he grabs the topic. It may seem clever to swoop in and change VfD-ed articles to a different topic, but it is equivalent to blanking the article during the course of a VfD, and it is not correct. --BM 23:00, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.