User talk:Suzanne Astorino

Welcome!

Hello, Suzanne Astorino, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Viriditas 01:35, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

hello[edit]

Hi Suzanne,

I happened to be editing Chris Layton at the same time as you. Your name is very familiar in connection with SRV, but I can't find anything. Were you a member of an SRV mailing list for example--or is there another connection? Regards Outriggr 06:13, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Alexander[edit]

What a great link. I kind of adopted the Joan page when I got frustrated at how devoid of information it was. I almost felt like I was intruding on her privacy as I did research. I'd like to find verifiable citations for the articles from the TV.com stuff, as it was pretty interesting.

From what I have pieced together, the surgeon husband is probably Jane's father, and Stanton would be her second husband.

I am also trying to persuade the superman boys that Joan is a major superman property, and is getting up there in years.

Anyway, I watch her on GSN every night, and I can tell the Name episodes are about to run out. I think Bob & Ray are its last hosts, and I do remeber Ralston is its last sponsor.--K3vin (talk) 23:51, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Alexander[edit]

I don't know if I have a tv.com userid i use the gmail so you can probably figure out my email address from this kevin3.0@ K3vin (talk)

Octopus[edit]

I don't want to rain on your parade, but despite its two helicopters and two submarines, at 413', Octopus isn't the worlds largest privately owned yatch. (Rising Sun (yacht) is 452', and Eclipse (yacht) is/will be 548'.) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 09:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There was no parade or rain in sight. I did not make the PDF file, I merely provided the link and used the title that was on page one of the PDF file. I will edit the file description. Nice photos on your site. Suzanne (talk) 19 April 2009

"Hi. There was no parade or rain in sight." - Good! I didn't want to be a "wet blanket".

"I did not make the PDF file, I merely provided the link" - I expected it was something like that.

"Nice photos on your site" - Thank you! (I think they're attractive; it's nice to hear I'm not alone.)

Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:31, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Old Curiosity Shop[edit]

I've reverted your edit - it wasn't a typo. The word is conceit: in literary terms, a conceit an extended metaphor with a complex logic that governs an entire poem or poetic passage. By juxtaposing, usurping and manipulating images and ideas in surprising ways, a conceit invites the reader into a more sophisticated understanding of an object of comparison. That's what Dickens was doing in his original version of the story. Hope this helps. 86.138.46.93 (talk) 12:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Suzanne (stage show)[edit]

The article Suzanne (stage show) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable play, can find no RS to satisfy WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:53, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of What's My Line? mystery guests for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of What's My Line? mystery guests is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of What's My Line? mystery guests until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AldezD (talk) 16:48, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello. Your recent edit to List of gangs in the United States appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 03:26, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Suzanne Astorino. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Suzanne Astorino. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Suzanne Astorino. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Suzanne Astorino. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]