User talk:AlexG

Welcome to the Wikipedia[edit]

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be Bold!

Sam [Spade] 18:04, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)

TextPad tool[edit]

Hi Alex. Your TextPad clip library looks useful. You might want to document it at Meta and add it to the MediaWiki tools category so more people know about it. Angela . 19:22, Aug 9, 2004 (UTC)

ISBN bug[edit]

Hi Alex. In clearing old sections from the village pump, I noticed you said "Perhaps this should be reported as a MediaWiki bug, but I don't know how to do that" in the Shipping Forecast section. There are instructions on this Wikipedia:Bug reports. All bugs are reported at MediaZilla:. Angela . 14:34, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip; looks like User:Kate has already fixed that problem. AlexG 15:55, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

George Fox[edit]

I just thought you'd like to know: I nominated George Fox as a featured article candidate. That's some impressive work you did there. Quadell (talk) 03:23, Sep 11, 2004 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I'm amazed that it only took two hours between my last major edit and your FAC nomination: Wikipedia works fast. --AlexG 11:45, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Re:Earth (Foundation universe)[edit]

I confess, I have not actually read the material from which these events come. I found it on a website that I found to be very meticulous and not at all frivolous, so I trusted its information, and picked a number of relevant fictional dates in Earth history. Unfortunately, its references are somewhat lacking, so I can't provide them. But there are a large number of obscure books floating around; after all, Asimov wrote several hundred. I can find some references to the Yoshida-Lefebre expedition, but the Prometheus seems quite obscure (only one English-language hit), so I'll try to investigate further. Cheers, •→Iñgólemo ←• 02:56, 2004 Sep 13 (UTC)

Could have been fanfiction yes; but I doubt it. The website that I got the information seems to be exclusively Asimov. The list of planets has no planet described in the Second Foundation series (example: Panucopia, Sarossa), or from the Caliban series (example: the Spacer world Inferno). I haven't scrutinised the timeline to heavily, but it probably follows the same Asimov-only patern. •→Iñgólemo ←• 18:35, 2004 Sep 14 (UTC)

Combinatorial species[edit]

F.H + G.K

F·H + G·K

I wonder if the second of the two displays above may be closer to what you intended? Michael Hardy 03:20, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Oooh, that's very nice! I didn't know about ·. I've updated Combinatorial species to use this (and \cdot in TeX) instead of ".". Thanks for \varnothing as well, which I agree is better than \emptyset. AlexG 20:25, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Vampire watermelon[edit]

Hi, AlexG. Vampire watermelon was vandalized again today. As far as I can tell from reviewing its talk page, the question of whether or not the legend is a hoax hangs mostly on the contents of some papers you were waiting to receive from the British Library. Have you received them yet? It's been two months. I'm sure all concerned are eager to have this issue settled one way or the other. —Triskaideka 18:55, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Hello, I just came across this page too. (It's been linked on memepool.) I'm also wondering if you've gotten those papers from the British Library yet. If you haven't yet, I can go look up the JGLS at my Uni library. I've already checked that we have it, and it's all in microfilm, it seems. mako 21:20, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Sorry for my lateness in replying; I've been away for a few days. I'm afraid the British Library has failed to send me anything... my faith in them is severely dented. Mako, if you could find the relevant documents that would be superb and you would have my undying gratitude. I would really like to get this page sorted out. Thanks also to Triskaideka for watching out for vandalism—from the language, it looks to be Andrew Heenan again. AlexG 18:14, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I went to the library this afternoon, and the naysayers are going to be mighty disappointed. One section of Vukanovic's article covers "Vampires of Vegetable Origin"; the next covers "Vampires originating from Agricultural Tools". Mention is made of pumpkins and watermelons, their transformation, and methods of destruction. Also, this belief is held by "Moslem Gypsies", and the date of Christmas is mentioned. I'll make scans of my copies ASAP. (I didn't need to bother with microfilm, as the hard copies are still on the shelf.)

My library also has a copy of Perkowski's Vampires of the Slavs. This book is actually a compilation of articles by various authors, and in fact reprints Vukanovic's piece in its entirety. While I was at the library I felt compelled to look for any earlier references to vegetal vampirism. A cursory search found a 1914 work (Dudley Wright's Vampires and Vampirism), but it focused on human vampirism and associated sensational tales. All of the scholarly-type accounts appear to be written in Czech. - mako 02:46, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This is magnificent work, mako! Well done, and thank you so much for your effort. I will be very interested to see what Vukanovic actually said. AlexG 19:10, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I'm working on putting together a page for the scans. You'll be able to find them here. The rewrite is all yours; have fun! - mako 07:39, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Category:UK Wikipedians[edit]

Hi, just to let you know that the list of UK participants at the UK notice board was getting rather long, so I have replaced it with the above category which I have added to your user page. -- Francs2000 | Talk 30 June 2005 18:35 (UTC)

Files missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:45, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Combinatorial species example 1.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:25, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikipedia syntax and templates.TCL listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wikipedia syntax and templates.TCL, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matrix unit for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matrix unit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matrix unit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The entry matrix unit was created by you with no references to any sources, and it continues being that way after more than a dozen of years. I can't find any references to matrix unit on the Internet either. That is except this page, which presents a different concept to the one decribed in the wikipedia entry. Also, either one of those concepts seems quite obscure in my opinion. I proposed this page for deletion. If you have a valid source please add it to the entry. Thank you! Mojoline (talk) 15:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for George Fox[edit]

I have nominated George Fox for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t · c) buidhe 21:56, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Combinatorial species example 1.png[edit]

The file File:Combinatorial species example 1.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Combinatorial species generic structure.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Combinatorial species multiplication.png[edit]

The file File:Combinatorial species multiplication.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Multiplication of combinatorial species.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:55, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Combinatorial species substitution.png[edit]

The file File:Combinatorial species substitution.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Composition (substitution) of combinatorial species.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:55, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]