This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles
This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Very interesting. The anon. User who opened this entry might add a couple of References and on-line External links so the rest of us can catch up. --Wetman 23:07, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that's enough time: I did it myself. The better title might be Gospel of the Savoiur as it's been published under this title and much of the information about it can be better accessed under this title. --Wetman 17:50, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I guess it was the decision of the two independent discovers/translators of the work to name it this, and at least Mirecki is an American, so he would likely use the standard American spelling. I'd like to see a link to the actual material, even if raw, untranslated mangled Coptic codex.Hypatea (talk) 21:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support rename to Gospel of the Saviour (or Savior) - cheers - Epinoia (talk) 20:41, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Thanks :) was tempted to switch to "Savior" as that was the spelling the authors originally published it under, but kept the British spelling in the end because of MOS:RETAIN. ‑‑YodinT 15:44, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Thanks :) was tempted to switch to "Savior" as that was the spelling the authors originally published it under, but kept the British spelling in the end because of MOS:RETAIN. ‑‑YodinT 15:44, 9 December 2018 (UTC)