Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defastenism

Defastenism[edit]

PLEASE NOTE: WHOEVER NOMINATED THIS ARTICLE FOR DELETION DID NOT PUT A TEMPLATE ON THE ARTICLE ABOUT IT!

Tyrenius 04:13, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New art movement only a couple of years old. 44 hits on google some of which are blog entries. Doesn't seem quite notable as of yet. --LeeHunter 00:50, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Delete, not notable. Megan1967 02:27, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable. We need to create a new abbreviation - I hereby propose that "nn" stand for "not notable". Think of the hours that could be saved by VfD wikipedians everywhere. --Spangineer ∞ 03:05, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Please don't encourage obscure abreviations, think of the ~~children~~ new contributors. Kappa 06:38, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep, an art movement with a presence in at least three different countries sounds notable to me.Bjones 18:04, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Google is not the final arbiter, and art has to have different criteria to pop stars. The crux is - will people wish to find out about this movement and access Wiki to do so. They have certainly been covered by the Irish press and elsewhere, so have a public presence, which will generate further enquiry. It doesn't matter how old they are - it matters how much interest there is in them. Media coverage is also a valid criterion. I am not affiliated to Defastenism, but have found it of sufficiently note to research and contribute to the article. P.S. ""They're the most vital thing that's happened in contemporary art in Dublin in a while." - The Dubliner, May 2005. Tyrenius 02:22, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]