Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mann Ltd

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 23:36, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Mann Ltd

"Mann Ltd is a small company that produces many things for web sites and other programs. They are run by a group of people." They also seem oddly non-notable. Advert. Rl 19:07, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. If a small company was run by a group of something other than people it might be notable, but otherwise, no. More proof of significance, influence, interest etc. is required. Average Earthman 19:40, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• delete — looks like a spoof --TimPope 20:24, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: I hope it's a hoax. It's rather like the sort of papers freshmen used to hand in, though: "There are several important things to consider when considering [Topic of Assignment], including [Clause 1 of assignment], [Clause 2 of assignment], and [Clause 3 of assignment]. These are very important things." Prank or unaccountable feebleness on an insignificant and nebulous entity. Geogre 01:23, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
• Edited by User:Mann Ltd, who has also been strewing copyright notices, claiming copyright over the whole of Wikibooks on behalf of Mann Ltd, all over the Main Page at Wikibooks, and giving Wikibooks such contributions as a wikibook entitled "Pie" whose sole content was a 5-line "poem" on how pie is "yum". Had this user made any worthwhile contributions to either Wikipedia or Wikibooks, my vote would have been "userfy". But xe hasn't. Delete. Uncle G 15:25, 2005 May 23 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.