Talk:Tax, tariff and trade

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

surely there must be some NPOV parts to this. how popular is the term?

http://www.google.ca/search?q=%22tax+tariff%22+trade+references


and there are repeated paragraphs, throughout the article. has no one even proofed this yet?

This article was originally written on 20 January 2003 by an unregistered user who appeared on that day only. The succeeding post was to delete the article as being from a banned ex-user. Subsequent versions have re-added the original text, expanding on it.

Query: why is this overly broad group of topics given a high priority status? It would be a good title for a multi-volume economics treatise involving dozens of renowned professors, but hasn't been done yet. The article would be better suited to the Economics project than the Taxation project.

I recommend that the status be lowered until there is more discussion as to relevance and feasibility.TaxPOVcop (talk) 04:58, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]