Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surrealist Group in Ioannina

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 22:31, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Surrealist Group in Ioannina

• Delete, Vanity, Spam, Non-Notable, Extremely unknown and non-notable group with no credible history at all to justify any encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is being exploited for the purposes of cheap promotion. Who are these people in this group? What justifies a Wikipedia article on this unknown entity? Please consider the fact that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not the place for Vanity articles and Spam.Classicjupiter2 04:26, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as absolute nonsense, link spam and "content" that does little more than echo the title. - Lucky 6.9 05:04, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. — flamingspinach | (talk) 06:29, 2005 Apr 15 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, promo. Megan1967 08:57, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not notable, spam. Seems to exist only as a platform for a link. Is it just me, or does anyone else notice a whole lot of dubious articles linking to this surreal coconut site? Possibly a stealth spam campaign? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:02, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
  • It does give me a sense of deja vu, yes. (delete btw) Radiant_* 14:48, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 22:57, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, surrealist vanity vandal spam. Cleduc 02:25, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Largely on grounds of content being minimal to the point of tautology. Alai 07:31, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.