User talk:Jmkprime

Welcome!

Hello, Jmkprime, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Binabik80 13:42, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the head up. --Jason Kirk 04:43, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking about getting rid of the "stub" status for submillimetre astronomy. What do you think? -- Jim Leous Jleous 04:52, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea.

Star formation nav box[edit]

Could you please update star formation nav box with one of the images from http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/html/heic0411.html or from other source? Now in Star Formation article we got 2 same images - witch is not very good looking. BTW, nav box is cool:) TestPilot 18:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've just uploaded a copy of that region to wikicommons and I've updated the star formation template. Hope that works. --Jason Kirk 09:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Thnx! TestPilot 14:29, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Protostar[edit]

On the protostar page your bot changed Sherriff to Sheriff, however in this particular case it is somebodies surname and not the gunslinger from the Old West. Probably best of leave that particular edit to a human as Sherriff is a fairly common varient when used as a surname. --Jason Kirk 12:56, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting that. Yes it's probably best if I leave it alone when capitalised. Cheers, CmdrObot 22:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Common.css[edit]

Per recent discussions, the way in which Persondata is viewed by Wikipedia editors has changed. In order to continue viewing Persondata in Wikipedia articles, please edit your user CSS file to display table.persondata rather than table.metadata. More specific instructions can be found on the Persondata page. --ShakingSpirit ^talk on behalf of Kaldari 01:17, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PHYS[edit]

Hi, I notice that you had some interest in physics. Might I interest you in joining WikiProject Physics?Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 06:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Burnham on Sea website[edit]

Don't revert my edit or you'll fall foul of 3RR. Instead go to the article's talk page and tell us why you think it should stay. --Simple Bob (talk) 21:38, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Cox (actor) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Cox (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Cox (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]