User talk:Wise mike
Hello. By adding a link to the Coptic Orthodox Church web site to the list at the bottom of the Eastern Orthodoxy article without a comment stating that it is not one of the canonical Eastern Orthodox churches may create an erroneous impression in the reader's mind that it is one of them. I added a comment. Michael Hardy 21:23, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Hello.It seems that wise mike added the link in eastern orthodoxy page by mistake as the words Oriental and Eastern are the same in Arabic Language.
--Slowking Man 08:18, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC)
- My mistake. --Slowking Man 00:45, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)
Would you be able to upload a copy of this image without the "St-Takla.org" tagline in the corner? It's a little distracting. Thanks. --Slowking Man 00:45, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)
- done :) -- Wise_Mike
External links[edit]
Hi Mike,
Just to let you know that you are getting overenthusiastic on adding links to your Coptic Orthodox Church site. If you don't get round to it first, I'll tidy them up when I get some time. There are a couple that are relevant, but many such as the links on architecture and color are way off the mark. It might help to look over the guidelines at Wikipedia:External links. -- Solipsist 21:12, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Please do not use Wikipedia to increase the popularity of a site you own or just like. Jdavidb 19:28, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
- I am sorry.. I noticed this mistake.. especially that of "color" page.. but that of Architecture is on the right place as there is Islamic Architecture at the same page too.. Anyway.. I'll be more careful with that next time.. thx for the note.. wise_mike , 6 September 2005 (UTC)
Please do not add any more links[edit]
Mike, please see these discussions:
- meta:Talk:Spam blacklist#st-takla.org
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy#Advice needed: should st-takla.org be blacklisted?
Thanks, --A. B. (talk) 16:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note A. B. I have added a reply to the discussions page, please check it out. And please note that it is not a spam by any ways, maybe at the very begining I was a bit enthusiastic about the Wikipedia idea, but afterwords I mainly never resubmitted links that were removed, and in the past couple of years I added just 2 links. Of course if this is making any kind of issues, I'd totally respect a decision of not adding any more links. Or I can suggest them to one of the editors.. Please also deliver this to those associated with this issue. Thanks. Wise_Mike (talk) 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:20, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Wise mike. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Wise mike. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)