User talk:Fairway~enwiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello[edit]

Hello, I am surprised that I am the first here. Anw, with regard to your last edits at Jerome Froese, do you have reliable sources? Feel free to e-mail me. regards.--Dr. Who 15:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They have been added. Thanks Fairway 20:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of AccurateRip, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.accuraterip.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of TAK (audio codec)[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is TAK (audio codec). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TAK (audio codec) (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of C167 family for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C167 family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C167 family until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Chris the Paleontologist (talkcontribs) 01:40, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of C167 family for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C167 family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C167 family (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Buenzli[edit]

The article Buenzli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An article based on original research and unreliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Λeternus (talk) 09:44, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

23:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

12:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)