Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bidder's organ/archive1

Bidder's organ

I think that this page is ought to bhe nominated since I placed a great deal of time researching about this, although it's a small article (length-wise). By being one of the featured articles, this page can increase people's awareness about a special organ in frogs-which may really boost Wikipedia's standing as a knowledge bank.

Nominated by User:Matthewprc. →Raul654 10:31, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)

• Object, wikipedia isn't a how-to guide. So I don't think the dissection guide should be there. The article also doesn't help in telling me what the organ looks like. Mgm|^(talk) 16:05, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)
• Object. Article is far too short and by no means FA material. Jacob1207 02:16, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Object This is an interesting stub but it has a long way to go. The dissection directions could be rewritten to describe the location of the organ. A picture would help with this. Tiles 05:48, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Object. Too short to be an FA. utcursch 06:14, Dec 30, 2004 (UTC)
• Object. Too short to be an FA. Ta bu shi da yu 06:19, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Object. Too short to be an FA. I moved some of my questions to the talk page of the article. I still think it's a potentially interesting topic and I might be willing to support (or to help improve the article further if some of the answers to my questions can be answered). This is a potentially interesting article, but it has to be more than a dissection guide (which could be rewritten for inclusion in a larger article). alteripse 14:41, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Agree, This is a nice article, and I personally think that this should be nominated. It states the organ's anatomy and physiology, which should be OK for a science or anatomy subject.

• Agree. This is a very informative article about the least-known organ in Anatomy, and should be nominated. I also think that a picture accompanying this would be (gross to some people. It is better not to have any picture)