Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Kim

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 11:12, May 15, 2005 (UTC)

Ted Kim[edit]

Non-notable, vanity. Delete. —Mar ka ci 2005-05-9 T 01:23 Z

Delete Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:41, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 05:01, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sympleko (Συμπλεκω) 11:33, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
d r3m0t ^talk 22:02, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, vanity and non-notable. --Lenev 00:34, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, vanity--Captain433180 18:58, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

delete!

Delete. Not notable, vanity. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:39, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.