Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JEM Management Corp.

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Tony Sidaway|Talk 22:55, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

JEM Management Corp.[edit]

non-notable - although the Wendy's finger-in-chilli incident is notable, this company is not involved in it in any really interesting way (as yet). The article was written by someone with a personal connection to the company and originally contained vanity comments about himself.XmarkX 08:43, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Truly outrageous! Mike H 21:37, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. psssssssssssh
Delete. Inclusionism only takes me so far; an article on every little company in the world is over the horizon. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 11:18, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. An article on "every little company"? No. An article on a company that owns 23 restaurants? Yes. Original article was quasi-vanity but at least it didn't contain the kind of puffery we often see in vanity articles about business, and the author's self-reference has been removed. JamesMLane 04:57, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.