Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Van Deusen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article Christine Van Deusen listed on WP:VFD Apr 26 to May 3 2004, consensus was to delete. Discussion:

vanity page. Maximus Rex 01:20, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)

  • Agreed. And, a nearly unreadable one to boot. - Lucky 6.9 02:32, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete - vanity -- Cyrius|&#9998 02:39, Apr 26, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity -- Graham  :) | Talk 05:38, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, vanity and poorly written, and probably copied from somewhere. Derrick Coetzee 18:47, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, it's patent nonsense Ellsworth 23:02, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Wow, she can take tests. Delete. RickK 23:10, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Well, she fails the "alot" test, and the Capital Letter Police are on Her Case, so I say "Deleat"! Denni 00:15, 2004 Apr 27 (UTC)
    • Comment: LOL! You mean her "upper case," right? And I thought I Was The only One to Notice that. - Lucky 6.9 00:29, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • I just assumed it was written in Olde English. Delete. Postdlf 5:08 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Decumanus | Talk 05:12, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Google gets 7 hits for Christine Van Deusen and 5 hits for Van Deusen, Christine, including one page that appeared on both searches. Of these 11 pages, one is a donor to a farm who's probably not the same person, two are Wikipedia copies, and seven are references on genealogy pages to people who would be older than Habib Miyan if they were alive today. One page apparently about her is called "deviantART". Interestingly, the contributor to (and apparent hostess of) this page calls herself "Anjui36", similar to the "Anjui63" who contributed to this page but with the number reversed. Published? Hmmmmmmmm. And the capitalization in this article seems to be random too. Wiwaxia 06:24, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • It's too bad she had her arm bitten by that dog. Nevertheless, delete. DS 03:49, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete unless woman bites dog in next few days - go girl. --Zigger 15:54, 2004 Apr 29 (UTC)

End discussion