Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spam fight back
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 17:50, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Spam fight back[edit]
Original research, kinda. It's apparently some suggestions for fighting spam, not very easy to understand, and I don't see how Wikipedia can use it, even under a different title. It did have a speedy tag, but it wasn't speedied for a couple of days, so I brought it here. Kappa 00:15, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete --nixie 02:26, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete A google search of "Spam fight back" gets only 3 relavent hits DaveTheRed 03:24, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I have personally never heard this term, and I am on the IT business and deal with SPAM issues daily. --Sn0wflake 16:59, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Poor title and too much an essay. jni 09:01, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Ditto all of the above (except I'm not currently in IT except as a consultant). HyperZonktalk 18:32, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Improve*
To Sn0wflake: Can you improve it? This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.