Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Dog

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Keep Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:21, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Dr. Dog

Doesn't establish notability. --W(t) 22:26, 2005 May 27 (UTC)

• Delete. It's a nicely written stub, and if someone can show these guys are well known I might change my vote. Harro5 22:30, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
  • 'Keep, provided Zombieface can produce some info on the WP:MUSIC criteria this band fits. Harro5 23:25, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I'm the author of the stub. I've added some more information on the band, but they have only recently become well-known, so I only have some information avalible. I'm willing to continue updating this stub, however. Zombieface 23:00, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Xcali 23:34, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. Completion of a national tour would meet one WP:Music guideline. Capitalistroadster 23:46, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, notability not established. Megan1967 02:40, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, they have an extensive article on allmusic and will be touring several states in June. RickK 21:59, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable. JamesBurns 11:13, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per RickK and praise from The New York Times critic. Kappa 16:57, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.