Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pure play

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - keep and cleanup - SimonP 13:44, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

Pure play

Original research, first person. RickK 00:16, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)

• Cleanup or transwiki to wikitionary. I know this is a common term because I've heard it a LOT, usually referring to online-only businesses like Amazon. Current article needs help. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:43, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Help the current article but do not delete it. Apart from the definition, it can describe the different investment characteristics of "pure play" companies, and be encyclopedic rather than dictionaric. Kappa 03:12, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not encyclopaedic. Megan1967 05:58, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, according to google the term is more commonly used for music/video stores and/or travel agencies. Radiant! 08:52, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Borderline keep - the term means something, but this REALLY needs references - David Gerard 23:15, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Help the current article and do not delete it. It does describe the method used in the capital budgeting for estimating individual project betas. --Lfchuang 07:50, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC)
• Keep but definitely cleanup. I suspect but can't prove a copyvio, others please keep an eye out. Fawcett5 21:45, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

This term refere to the organization which they conduct their business activities solely online