Talk:Macro-mutation

Untitled[edit]

"However beneficial macromutations have been known to occur. For example the addition of body segments among arthropods may be regarded as a macromutation."

This article is terrible and full on non-sense

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.41.31.163 (talk) 21:12, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you cite evidence that it actually is a macromutation? Or, taking two animals taxonomically closer together, the human has 23 pairs of chromosomes, the chimpanzee 24. Are the genomes the same except that the human is missing one pair? If so, one would expect humans to be occasionally born to chimps, as Down syndrome people are occasionally born to humans. -phma

The genomes are not the same in the sense you suggest.--35.10.47.197 18:24, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

macromutation refers to genome or phenotype?[edit]

this process is macromutation, essentially when a large-scale mutation produces a characteristic.

I do not really know, but I think that the "large scale" of macromutations refers only to the phenotypic effect, rather than what´s happening on the genes. That means, the mutation is no molecularly different than one that causes the average minor phenotypic variations on the population. I think I´m right because simple mutations in hox genes are enough to cause the sort of drastic phenotypic changes mentioned on the article, and at the same time, large mutations at the molecular level, such as Robertsonian fusions might have no big phenotypic consequences.

But if it realy refers to something bigger happening with the genes themselves, I think it should be more specific; if not, it should be mentioned. If both happens, should be made explicit that what matters is the phenotypic effect. --Extremophile 03:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Generally it's referring to genes. However, a large change in phenotype can also be the result of only a small change in base pairs - maybe even just one. This isn't a 'true' macromutation, and it's important to distinguish the two types. Richard001 03:23, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

No contrary opinion after a week, so I'm taking WP:SILENCE as acceptance of the merge. -- Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 12:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is wholly unsourced.
It's most prominent sub-topic would appear to be Hopeful Monster, which has a large section explicitly on 'Large scale mutations' i.e. Macromutations
I'm therefore proposing that we merge the title of this article with the sourced content of Hopeful Monster, via a WP:USURPTITLE.
(Parenthetically, there's also some material turned up at WP:FTN#Soren Lovtrup that can be used to expand out this topic slightly, so that it's not wholly on Goldschmidt.)

Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 03:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.