User talk:Rukkyg
Uhm, perhaps you should take a walk over to the VCC around midnight some weeknight this semester. The labs are still very much used. Both by grad students who haven't bought laptops, and by laptop-users collaborating with other laptop-users, using the laptop jacks. MrItty 10:40, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
It's important you take a look at your new article and decide what to do about it since it currently does not meet Wikipedia standards as presently written.
The most important concern is whether this organization is important enough to merit inclusion in Wikipedia -- see:
- Wikipedia:Notability (organizations) -- what makes an organization worth including in Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:Verifiability -- what volunteers look for in terms of "proof"
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources -- what are the sorts of sources volunteers consider to be credible when assess verifiablilty
- Wikipedia:No original research -- what goes in the article needs to come from somewhere else, not just your own head or "everybody knows that ..." Having said that, paraphrase other sources -- don't violate copyrights (that gets material instantly deleted.)
Second, the article reads a bit like a press release; see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, especially the section that reads "Wikipedia is not a soapbox". Also see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
You'll want to address these issues pretty soon or your article may get deleted.--A. B. 19:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article North American Young Generation in Nuclear, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. A. B. (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Tax cut[edit]
If you're going to tag an article as POV, please add some comments to the discussion page on why you believe it violates the NPOV policy. What points of view are not included and what areas present bias. Otherwise, editors may not understand your objection and remove the tag. Morphh (talk) 14:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)