Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vol au vent

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. — Trilobite (Talk) 15:16, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Vol au vent

This article was listed for deletion by 81.178.101.133. -- Longhair | Talk 11:37, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Keep -- and cleanup. They're available here in Australia. Longhair | Talk 11:37, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Encyclopedic. Relevant. Non-obvious. -- Marcika 13:57, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, non-obvious, and delicious. Kappa 15:12, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I'd certainly like to try one. ¶ If I had spotted this, I would have just deleted the VfD template. If somebody can't be bothered to explain why they want something deleted, a debate is a waste of time. ----Isaac R 19:39, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep article is perfectly fine and anon didn't provide rationale to prove otherwise. Mgm|^(talk) 21:34, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. Notable food. Capitalistroadster 23:33, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and eat. Mmmmm...vollervonts! Grutness...wha? 02:55, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and eat as above :p ··gracefool |☺ 08:22, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and eat. Don't see anything wrong with this entry. Have just used it to validate a quiz question. Ringbark 09:35, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, eat and expand. Where is the history, the diferent sizes you can buy, etc?--Takver 02:01, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, but the article needs to be cleaned up. Dr.frog 14:29, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.