Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broadmoor Hotel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

wikispam? Does not tell why this hotel is relevant for an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. andy 16:03, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep stub. Famous resort [1], although less so today than 50 years ago. -- Decumanus | Talk 16:09, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete. Pedro 16:22, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Seems to be of historical interest, at least as far as hotels go. Keep. -- Cyrius|&#9998 17:12, May 4, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Alcarillo 18:06, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Stub was suggested to differentiate between the Broadmoor Hotel and Broadmoor Hospital, which already has a listing on Wikipedia. Of local cultural interest to Colorado Springs and Colorado. Speedeep 18:14, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not only keep, but, honestly, shame on whoever listed this - the listing went in less than 15 minutes after the article was first posted, and the first post's comments indicated that the article was a beginning. Give articles a chance to develop, and, beyond that, give new users a chance. You just VFDed a first time user's first article - one that it looks like was written in good faith. Way to drive newbies away. Snowspinner 21:32, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Historically and culturally significant. BTW, wasn't this the hotel used in The Shining? - Lucky 6.9 21:59, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Significant establishment. Famous locally and nationally. One of the few five-star hotels in the world. —Frecklefoot 16:48, May 7, 2004 (UTC)
    • I've removed the VfD boilerplate. I hope there are no objections...? Oh, and thanks for the info, Decumanus. Much obliged. - Lucky 6.9 01:28, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]