Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Hyper-Color
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. dbenbenn | talk 00:15, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Global_Hyper-Color[edit]
Stub describing a kind of t-shirt. Notable or vanity? --Radiant! 10:42, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, expand and perhaps rename. Google receives more hits using "Global Hypercolour" (no hyphen), so I'm assuming the correct name is the latter? Megan1967 01:51, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - I remember this fad. Had one of the shirts until my mom ran it through the dryer on a too-high setting and destroyed the color change ability. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:39, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I remember it, too. Someone once gave me some socks like this. Keep, Move as per Megan1967, and add a Redirect from Global_Hyper-Colour for good measure. Uncle G 03:57, 2005 Feb 13 (UTC)
- Keep notable, highly collectable as well if you can find one that still will change color. Problem is most of them stopped working after a few washes. Notable also for making you look like your arpits were soaked through the entire time you wore them. (For the record I still own a functional one that I wear to 1980s themed parties) ALKIVAR™
06:13, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC) - Keep. Notable. Damn, now if only I could remember the name of the Seattle company that made these. They had a short dramatic run & went broke. When I worked at Active Voice in the early 1990s, we were partly in their former offices. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:57, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep WLD 09:04, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.