Talk:Sex position

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Former featured listSex position is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 9, 2005Featured list candidatePromoted
October 10, 2006Featured list removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Former featured list

section: Number of positions, and effects on physical abilities[edit]

here is a mention of the "starfish position" which is the first and only time throughout the article, without any clarification to it. this results in inconsistency. my suggestion is either delete this sentence or clarify in the article what is this.89.134.199.32 (talk) 00:50, 16 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

I agree 2602:306:BDBD:C00:F835:B7C4:539D:3BB9 (talk) 00:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Slovoko (talk) 05:49, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2603:6080:4B03:BC06:998:9457:4E56:F3CE (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)It needs more diversity- e.g. two women; the initial picture is mostly man-woman (and mostly man in a controlling position) with some man-man. Additionally, they are all penetrative. Non-penetrative sex positions should be given greater focus2603:6080:4B03:BC06:998:9457:4E56:F3CE (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@2603:6080:4B03:BC06:998:9457:4E56:F3CE they made a whole other page about it man Moho84 (talk) 21:42, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

y[edit]

impreove performance of this page it is so laggy Moho84 (talk) 21:43, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I advise you not to jerk off to this page. Geanard (talk) 04:02, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]