Talk:Steven Seagal

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Steven Seagal article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 30 days

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Martial arts: Karate

	Martial arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts articles
	This article is supported by Karate task force.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animal rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

"Unplanned 2:30 A.M. Trip Through Steven Seagal's Wikipedia Page Worth Every Goddamn Second". The Onion. May 18, 2020.

Seagalogy[edit]

I am not sure that the term 'auteur theory' applies in connection to 'Seagalogy', which focuses on Seagal's various roles as actor. The closing credits for 'Today you Die,' for instance, lists a unit-producer first, and not director. In most of the of the films listed in this article Seagal does not have a director credit. 2600:6C54:77F0:7880:EC23:2F17:CCAE:BDFE (talk) 03:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PR-like tone[edit]

I agree that the tone of this article appears to downplay the validity of allegations against Seagal and reads like a PR defense campaign. Each of the criticisms are presented as one would expect legal defenses to be written: "Here is a watered-down recap of the accusation, and here is an explainer on why that accusation has been rendered invalid or irrelevant."

I suspect a PR entity or Russian friends have locked-down the narrative here. This reads like it is essentially a fan page and resumé for Mr. Seagal's accomplisments, not an objective encyclopedic article, which would include a comprehensive array of critical perspectives. navkat (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]