Talk:Woo-Hoo (Rock-A-Teens song)

When[edit]

Was this song based off the Hot Rod Lincoln song? --SuperDude 13:52, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have no clue how to even answer this. Are you asking when, or are you asking if it even is based off that song? Another example of really crappy section title -- 70.56.81.63 (talk) 22:14, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Counting[edit]

Whether it's his 5th film is not interesting in this article -- especially when failing to specify whether you're counting when his participation was as writer, director, actor, or any of the above.
--Jerzy•t 17:42, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can't provide any insight since you didn't bother writing who you're talking about. "Counting" is a really bad section title. -- 70.56.81.63 (talk) 22:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

George's[edit]

IMDb] & the credits make the song George Donald McGraw's. He has "35 of about 62" Google hits, some of which could support at least a bio stub.
--Jerzy•t 17:42, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The RockATeens?[edit]

How could they have recorded the song in 1959 when they did not form until 1994? FMAFan1990 01:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They formed in 1956

http://ww3.telerama.com/~agp/Cool_200508.html

You're confusing them with a different band of the same name

http://www.artistdirect.com/nad/music/artist/bio/0,,869796,00.html#bio

You all[edit]

need to learn how to make relevent section titles in the discussion page so people know what's being talked about. Like "when". And who is the "his" referring to under "counting"? Maybe a better section title would have been who you're talking about so someone else can actually help you. -- 70.56.81.63 (talk) 22:12, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved the two song articles. As the requested move was not notified at the disambiguation page, I have merely dropped the disambiguator rather than move "Woo Hoo" to "Woohoo". DrKiernan (talk) 15:14, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

– These two songs are too closely titled, and the original Woo Hoo (disambiguation) too generic and too much variation for two standalone singles titles depending on a hyphen or a cap to be stable/helpful disambiguation; therefore both articles currently fail #1 and #3 of WP:NAMINGCRITERIA. The original 1959 Woo-Hoo has been re-recorded many times, and the Japanese girl band version in Tarantino's Kill Bill and UK Carling beer advert/singles chart is reported with WooHoo Woo-Hoo Woo Hoo Woohoo... all of which should redirect to Woo Hoo (disambiguation). However removing "(disambiguation)" from the disamb in itself isn't helpful since, given the different spellings, that helps people wanting the two singles avoid it. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:05, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. The disambiguation page should be the target of all basis spellings. Though I would move the diambiguation page to Woo-hoo -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:01, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support with everything going to Woohoo. Red Slash 05:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support and turn Woohoo into a disambiguation page. Steel1943 (talk) 05:37, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]