Talk:Christadelphians

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comparisons to other groups[edit]

The theology comparisons are proselytizing and not informative. They should be deleted. (crazenate) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.28.9.135 (talk) 16:21, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above comment. The Comparisons section is essentially an apologetic work and contains numerous claims which are dubious or debatable, including: Clement of Rome's beliefs about the intermediate state, Jonathan ben Uzziel's beliefs about Satan, the Christology of the Nazarenes, etc. Tjfarrar1983 (talk) 09:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree. Anyone opposed to removing this section?Richardson mcphillips (talk) 01:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Basing their beliefs solely on the Bible ... not[edit]

They are Millerites because they follow the Day-year principle. So the notion that they base their beliefs solely on the Bible is their own fiction. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 18:41, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. Nobody does straight Bible all by itself. What should we change in the article? Alephb (talk) 20:45, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind. Found it! Alephb (talk) 20:48, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An Apology to Anyone Watching This Article[edit]

After a fairly long editing spree, I just discovered the page WP:LINKROT and discovered that I may have removed some dead links from this page that I should not have removed. Any time I dedicate to Wikipedia will be focused on restoring any links I should not have removed from this article until I have restored them all. My apologies. I had it in my head that dead links could simply be removed, and it seems I was wrong. I'll work to make the problem right. After this I'll check John Thomas and see if I removed any links I shouldn't have. If you notice any other times I've violated WP:LINKROT, I'll work to fix those violations as well. In the future I intend to work through the processes recommended at WP:LINKROT first. Alephb (talk) 01:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All right. I reverted my whole editing spree, the article is in the condition I found it in. Alephb (talk) 01:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Christadelphians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Christadelphians&oldid=1206678505"