Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penis reduction

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 14:47, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Penis reduction

I started going through google for this but I'm not finding anything enclyclopedic. Most of the entries seem to be jokes (or preposterous bragging). The original entry may have involved using the term to derogatorilly describe circumcision. I did find a hit that used this terminology for circumcision, but that is not what the article is talking about. Could rewrite it to an article about how some people refer to circumcision as penis reduction surgery (if this is common enough to warrant it) but otherwise delete as non-sense (unless someone can find evidence this actually exists and documents it). RJFJR 21:05, May 8, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete I guess just about any body part could potentially have reduction/enlargement surgery procedures (i.e. ear enlargement, thumb reduction, etc.), but unless it's actually done, there's no need to have an article on it. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:46, May 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not encyclopaedick. Megan1967 04:07, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Sigh, another cock-amamie pun. Barno 17:40, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - joke - Tεxτurε 22:09, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Heh, but redirect to Circumcision if you like :) Whig 07:53, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.