Talk:Galaxy 4

Galaxy 4 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 12, 2023	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 26, 2023.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the gender of the villains in Galaxy 4 was switched to female partly due to the women's liberation movement?

Doctor Who Mid‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Title[edit]

Isn't "Galaxy 4" the more standard rendering? Timrollpickering 22:25, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I'm moving this. --khaosworks 22:52, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

Missing?[edit]

I recall seeing at least episode of this story since 2000 in Australia... Can anyone else confirm? Adamm 03:38, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You recollection is quite faulty.Mmm commentaries 04:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - it must have been the long clip that is on the DVD. Adamm 22:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamm (talk • contribs)

Audio narrator[edit]

This article states that the narrator of the audiobook is Peter Purves, but the back cover of the audiobook itself lists Colin Baker as the narrator. Then again, it doesn't sound like Colin Baker. Maybe it's Peter Purves and the BBC has it wrong? How about some documentation? Alexbook (talk) 23:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Episode 3 recovered[edit]

It has just been announced at a BFI screening that Episode 3 of Galaxy 4 and Episode 2 of The Underwater Menace have been recovered - I'm waiting for the BFI to publish something as the only sources at the moment are news articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.251.252.94 (talk) 17:47, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Galaxy 4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gallifreyone.com/episode.php?id=t
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080808114215/http://www.drwhoguide.com/who_t.htm to http://www.drwhoguide.com/who_t.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Galaxy 4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121223033727/http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~ecl6nb/OnTarget/1986/galaxy/86galaxy.htm to http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~ecl6nb/OnTarget/1986/galaxy/86galaxy.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No In print sections[edit]

List of articles (13 total) with no "In print" section
Date	Title	Author
24 Mar 1977	Doctor Who and the Dalek Invasion of Earth	Terrance Dicks
21 Aug 1980	Doctor Who and the Keys of Marinus	Philip Hinchcliffe
11 Apr 1985	Marco Polo	John Lucarotti
12 Sep 1985	The Myth Makers	Donald Cotton
10 Apr 1986	Galaxy Four	William Emms
18 Jun 1987	The Space Museum	Glyn Jones
16 Jul 1987	The Sensorites	Nigel Robinson
17 Sep 1987	The Romans	Donald Cotton
21 Jan 1988	The Rescue	Ian Marter
17 Mar 1988	The Time Meddler	Nigel Robinson
20 Jul 1989	The Chase	John Peel
21 Sep 1989	The Daleks' Master Plan Part I: Mission to the Unknown	John Peel
18 Jan 1990	Planet of Giants	Terrance Dicks

All 13 are entirely from William Hartnell – First Doctor serials. all the rest beyond the First Doctor has "In print" section/headings.
I took this to the talk page here, explained my reasoning, now re-adding "in print" to this article. Best, --Discographer (talk) 00:27, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Discographer: I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here except that several articles don't have "In print" sections—and therefore this one needn't have one either. Reverted your edit while this discussion is ongoing per WP:STATUSQUO. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 00:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhain: The articles that have no "in print" are listed in the wikitable above. The addition of "in print" gives the rest of us who have links to these articles via books a type of anchor to connect to. --Discographer (talk) 00:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Discographer: I've added anchors to the articles listed above. That should solve your problem. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 00:54, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhain: Okay. Thank you. Best, --Discographer (talk) 00:58, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]