Talk:Final Doom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Just a note: in the interview, Casali says Plutonia was finished in January 1995. He must have meant 1996 since Evilution was made first. Fredrik | talk 20:45, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Development/Publishing[edit]

The developer/publisher information seems rather inaccurate or misleading. The games were developed by Team TNT and the Casali brothers with and for id Software (that provided the game Final DOOM was made with and modified the code of Doom a bit to allow a version of the DOS executable to run the two new IWADs, at least), where id Software also primarily published the product. This included bundling the two wads and offering the product directly to the public (for download, for example). Additionally, companies (such as GT Interactive, Activision, and Virgin Interactive) mostly took care of a good part of the publishing process by adding ways of distribution, preparing adaptations for the existing product, and promoting it as required. Who is like God? (talk) 08:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia gone[edit]

I deleted the trivia. The Styx reference should be common knowledge and/or irrelevent, as well as the fact the back cover had minor technical errors. vroman (talk) 04:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's a minor technical error to claim that a game has 64 levels when it actually only has 30. Ben 2082 (talk) 05:58, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Release date[edit]

Was this game first released in '95 or '96? Article says in the lead '96 but in the infobox it says the PlayStation version was released already in '95. --Mika1h (talk) 19:45, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I took new release dates from MobyGames, they seem to make more sense. --Mika1h (talk) 19:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Final Doom 2[edit]

I have a few articles that I printed out years ago that mentioned a "final doom 2" being in the making for the nintendo 64, but I can't find any mention of it now. Anyone know anything about this? I would love to know what became of it, I was sort of looking forward to it, and it would be an interesting note on either this page or the doom 64 page as some kind of trivia or side note B10Reaper (talk) 20:03, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you were looking forward to more of Final Doom, Plutonia 2 has this. Not official but quite good. http://doom.wikia.com/wiki/Plutonia_2 95.109.102.252 (talk) 20:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final Doom[edit]

Is this game known as the original Doom 3? Cheyenne Cigars (talk) 01:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plt25.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Plt25.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:35, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final Doom coming to xbox 360[edit]

Check the Entertainment Software Rating Board at http://www.esrb.org/ratings/search.jsp

Then look for 'Final Doom', it clearly shows Final Doom coming to Xbox 360 but since I don't have a date it should known as TBA till a date is confirmed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronnie42 (talkcontribs) 23:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Final Doom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Final Doom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]