Talk:Civilization (video game)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Civilization (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131110114010/http://www.civfanatics.com/civ1/index.php to http://www.civfanatics.com/civ1/index.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130822213423/http://www.civfanatics.com/interviews/CivChronicles_Bruce_Shelley.php to http://www.civfanatics.com/interviews/CivChronicles_Bruce_Shelley.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:42, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Civilization (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140501194619/http://www.gameology.org/alien_other/colonization to http://www.gameology.org/alien_other/colonization

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Source

• https://web.archive.org/web/20001204134100/http://www.gamespot.com:80/features/sidlegacy/civi.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimmyBlackwing (talk • contribs) 04:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
• https://archive.org/details/CGStrategyPlus_assorted/CG-StrategyPlus-14/page/n19/mode/2up — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimmyBlackwing (talk • contribs) 07:44, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Release date confusion?

Can we correct, clarify, or remove some of the sections of this article that talk about the game's release date? Because they're all over the place!

The first para says 1991, and the infobox says September 1991, but then we get:

• "Civilization was released in early 1991" at the end of Development at MicroProse (completely uncited)
• Reception cites a preview of the game published in December 1991!!

Surely they can't all be true?! --MysteriousBoron (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

• Okay, checking the sources: the one used for "early 1991" in fact does not mention "early", just 1991. The other, the one that is giving its preview, that's citing the date that's stamped onto the magazine, which was probably mailed out well before Dec 1991, so that's just awkward language, the date doesn't need to be in that sentence. Sept 1991 is likely correct but I'm going to try to double check that. --Masem (t) 14:17, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
  • And to just confirm, I walked though some issues of CGW and it was clear that by the time CGW hit that Dec 1991 issue, the game was already out and they were reviewing it, not previewing it, (which at that time in the industry was an oddity). --Masem (t) 14:38, 16 April 2021 (UTC)