Talk:United States Environmental Protection Agency

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the United States Environmental Protection Agency article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

United States: Government Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as High-importance).

Environment High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Citizendium Porting (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Citizendium Porting, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Citizendium PortingWikipedia:WikiProject Citizendium PortingTemplate:WikiProject Citizendium PortingCitizendium Porting articles

Science Policy High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

AnnaEPAAA (talk · contribs) has been paid by the EPA Alumni Association. Their editing has included contributions to this article. disclosure

preview page problem[edit]

The preview pages for the EPA page have a problem. See for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Volt I don't know how to investigate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.220.15.57 (talk) 16:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Program "One Cleanup Program"[edit]

I don't see any mention or reference to the EPA's "One Cleanup Program" of which I have found reports and information on. First on what I believe is a local FOIA site, and second on the EPA site archives.

There are multiple elements of notability in my belief, for example

-In relation to the York PA Article, as a site there is the first in the US to volunteer and enroll in the program

-Possibly with the Harley-Davidson Article, as that is the location of said site

-It's an EPA program, so it should at least be included in the EPA article

-Information on the "York site remedy" FOIA (?) page seems very thorough and complete, including reports and maps.

These two pages by themselves could possibly be used as a basis for expanding multiple articles or creating an article/articles.

So far, all I have done is include this program in the EPA article under the programs list. Darwulf (talk) 23:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Programs" section: Major reorganization and expansion needed -- Please help[edit]

The "Programs" section is still missing many basic summaries of EPA's major programs, despite this section being tagged as such ten years ago. I will add a basic structure for the section:

Core programs (as mandated by the main authorizing statutes)
Additional programs (enhancements & interpretations of the statutory missions)
Past programs

I will add some descriptions for the individual core programs where I can, but I will need help from the many knowledgeable folks out there. Please help by adding concise descriptions with references. Currently we have a bunch of descriptions for many "additional" programs, but we need descriptions for many of the core components, particularly the Clean Air Act programs. There is good material in the articles for the various statutes, that can be used to develop brief summaries. Thanks. Moreau1 (talk) 23:08, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Remove 'Undue weight' tag from Controversies section?[edit]

Just looking for consensus here. I edited this section a bit - pared down some less-relevant info, and reorganized the sub-sections. It seems more balanced now (though the language in this section could use improvement...)

Anyone second? 71.40.21.239 (talk) 20:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The EJ and FOIA sub-sections are way out of date. They are too old to be informative and not worth placing in the chron section. Unless someone can provide current info/refs on these topics, they should be deleted. The first section (agency authority) is more recent and can be retained, for now. Moreau1 (talk) 18:05, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Going to have to disagree. If information is or was true, it deserves to remain chronicled. Just because the section could be better, or more up-to-date, doesn't mean it should just be removed. 71.40.21.239 (talk) 21:55, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Environmental Justice EJS300[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2022 and 15 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Redearedslider11 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Redearedslider11 (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review and suggestion[edit]

This wiki page looks well thought out and has great explanatory content. For a class I am reviewing pages to make sure there are no big errors and the only thing I could find was that a few of the citations are "not found", or do not pull up the proper article. There may be slight typos in the citation or loss of access to the article for further information.

Cheers! PaigeHerkemij (talk) 01:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trimming minor details[edit]

I trimmed the history section to keep the focus on what the EPA did, rather than emphasize weakly connected details about personalities. Rjensen (talk) 23:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]