Talk:2000s in film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

let me know about hindi films

isn't Labyrinth_(film) a film belonging to 1986 and not 2000s?

Film trends[edit]

Should there be something about the massive trend in Hollywood towards releasing sequels (Live Free or Die Hard, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull), prequels (Star Wars), remakes (War of the Worlds, The Invasion, The Manchurian Candidate), reboots (The Sum of All Fears, Batman Begins, Casino Royale) or adaptations (Transformers and Dukes of Hazzard from TV, X-Men, Spiderman, Iron Man from comics, Lord of the Rings from novels), rather than original work? And most of these are throwbacks to earlier decades, not simply a continuation of films or products from the nineties. Seems like a retro trend in filmmaking that's worth mentioning in my opinon. 147.9.201.154 (talk) 21:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree! 2000s in film is remakes in film. We just have to find some good sources for that. Ran4 (talk) 09:35, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also the trend for reboots - is this something that has happened more in 2000s? (Indeed, have there been any reboots in film before 2000?) Mdwh (talk) 22:42, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. 143.44.196.78 (talk) 19:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Early 2000s direct-to-video animated sequels produced by DisneyToon Studios[edit]

Any theatrical releases of animated features were produced by Walt Disney Feature Animation in the early 2000s, but not included direct-to-video animated sequels produced by DisneyToon Studios (such as The Little Mermaid II and Cinderella II), the first Disney animated film to be first theatrical release in the 2000s decade was Fantasia 2000 (1999), the sequel to the 1940 classic Fantasia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.0.238.12 (talk) 23:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Complex magazine 100 best movies of decade[edit]

Can we add top 100 movies of 2000s by Complex magazine with top 5 as 1. Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy 2. Iron man 3. 28 days later 4. The 40 Year-Old Virgin 5. City of God Ashokkumar47 (talk) 05:54, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]