Acts of Peter and the Twelve

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not to be confused with Acts of Peter.
Part of a series on
New Testament apocrypha
First page of the Gospel of Judas
(Page 33 of Codex Tchacos)
Apostolic Fathers
Apocryphal gospels
Jewish–Christian gospels
Infancy gospels
Gnostic gospels
Other gospels
Lost gospels
Apocalypses
Epistles
Lost epistles
Acts
Misc.
Other apocrypha
Related topics
icon Christianity portal

The Acts of Peter and the Twelve[1][2] or the Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles[3][4] is a Christian text from about the 4th century.[5] It is the first treatise in Codex VI of the Nag Hammadi library texts,[6][7] taking up pages 1–12 of the codex's 78 pages.[6] The writing extends the Parable of the Pearl from Matthew 13:45–46.[8][9] In the text, Peter the Apostle meets a pearl merchant named Lithargoel, who is later revealed to be Jesus.[10] Jesus commands the apostles to care for the poor.[11]

History[edit]

Before its discovery in Nag Hammadi, Egypt in 1945,[4] the text was completely unknown.[12] The discovered text is written in Coptic and was likely created in c. 300–350 AD.[6] The retention of two Greek vocatives in the text, however, is evidence that the tractate is a translation of a Greek original.[6] Scholars give a general estimate for the date of the original as the 2nd or 3rd century AD,[13] but its final redaction may have been written as late as 367 AD.[1][2]

The first four sheets of papyrus, containing pages 1–8, have some damage to the text at the top.[6][10] Thus, the introductory lines are unclear.[2] On the other two sheets of papyrus, containing pages 9–12, the text is mostly intact.[14][15]

Along with the rest of the works in the Nag Hammadi library, the text was translated into English and published in The Nag Hammadi Library in English in 1977.[16] The publication was part of the work of the Coptic Gnostic Library Project, which began in 1966 at Claremont Graduate University.[17] Douglas M. Parrott and R. McL. Wilson translated the text to English.[18]

The text has also been translated into French, German, and Norwegian.[19]

Summary[edit]

The apostles arrive at a small city called Habitation and Peter seeks lodging. They meet a man who introduces himself as Lithargoel, meaning "the light, gazelle-like stone". Lithargoel warns Peter that the road is very dangerous and the apostles must abandon everything they have and fast to travel it. Peter discovers that the city is named Habitation because those who endure the trials and difficulties of the storms will inhabit the city and be included in the kingdom of heaven. Peter and the apostles forsake everything as Lithargoel instructed and evade the hardships successfully. They rest at the city gate and talk about the faith.

Depiction of Christ from the 8th-century Icon of Christ and Abbot Mena, a sample of early Coptic art

Lithargoel changes his appearance to a physician. Peter is frightened when the physician addresses him by his name, but Peter then recognizes him as Jesus Christ. The apostles worship him and pledge to do as he wishes. Jesus commands them to go back to the city of Habitation to teach and heal all those who have believed in his name. Jesus explains that physicians of souls heal the heart. Jesus also tells the apostles not to dine with the rich men of the city who do not acknowledge him and to judge them with uprightness so that their ministry may be glorified and his name may be glorified in the churches. The apostles worship the Lord Jesus and he departs from them in peace.[20]

Analysis[edit]

Since the narrative voice shifts between first and third person, scholars have debated whether it is the work of multiple authors or simply literary technique.[4] Theologian Andrea L. Molinari argues that the text contains five voice shifts and three separate sources, but a shift in voice does not necessarily entail a change of source.[21] Citing analyses by New Testament scholar Vernon K. Robbins[22] and Stephen J. Patterson,[23] Molinari notes that in the narration of ancient sea-voyage stories, it was common to shift to first-person plural voice.[24] But the text also has voice shifts when the narrative perspective changes.[25] Molinari concludes that the author of the text added his own material to the end of two other sources.[26] Molinari believes that the entirety of the text up to the point that the physician quickly leaves and comes back (1.1–9.1) is from a single source.[26] He believes that the post-resurrection appearance (9.1–9.29) is from a second source.[26] The remainder of the text (9.30–12.19), in Molinari's view, is the author's attempt to link the other two sources with his own beliefs about pastoral ministry.[27]

Academic István Czachesz argues that the text is an allegory for monasticism and that it came from a Pachomian monastery in 347–367 AD.[2][7] Czachesz sees parallels between the written Pachomian rules and Lithargoel's warnings about avoiding the dangers of the road.[28] Czachesz believes that the city of Habitation could be symbolic of the monastery, and Lithargoel could represent Pachomius.[29] Furthermore, the themes expressed by Jesus near the end of the text—providing for the poor, healing them, and condemning the rich—match the Pachomian monastic tradition.[30]

Czachesz also finds the explanation for the meaning of Lithargoel's name questionable.[1] He considers it grammatically problematic to simply combine the Greek words for 'stone' and 'light'.[31] He suggests instead that the name comes from the Greek adjective meaning 'forgetful', which is also used in Syriac as a Greek loanword.[32] This change allows Czachesz to theorize that Lithargoel was originally the protagonist of the pearl merchant story, based on similarities to the Hymn of the Pearl.[33] It also allows Czachesz to identify Syria as the origin of the pearl narrative,[34] which was later edited by the Pachomian redactor.[35]

Scholars debate whether the work is Gnostic, since the texts discovered at Nag Hammadi in Egypt were mostly Gnostic writings.[36] Although the text lacks explicitly Gnostic views, its themes could be interpreted as Gnostic.[3][36] Molinari hypothesizes that the source material of the pearl merchant story contained elaborate Gnostic themes,[37] but Czachesz considers Molinari's Gnostic hypothesis unnecessary.[38]

Religious historian Alicia J. Batten explores thematic affinities between the text and the Epistle of James.[39] She sees the most obvious and significant similarities between the two works as the critique of the rich and the directive to care for the poor.[40] Both works also emphasize endurance, renunciation of the world, and healing both the body and soul.[40] She concludes that although the author does not explicitly cite James, the author may have drawn from ideas in James.[41]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Czachesz, István (2005). "The Identity of Lithargoel in the Acts of Peter and the Twelve". The Wisdom of Egypt: 485–502. doi:10.1163/9789004331013_028. ISBN 9789047407676. Retrieved March 1, 2023.
  2. ^ a b c d Czachesz, István (2002). Acts of Peter and the Twelve (PDF). University of Groningen. pp. 155–171. Retrieved February 7, 2023. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  3. ^ a b Parrott, Douglas M.; Wilson, R. McL. (1981). The Nag Hammadi library in English. San Francisco: Harper & Row. pp. 265–270. ISBN 9780060669294. Retrieved February 28, 2023.
  4. ^ a b c Molinari, Andrea Lorenzo (1996). The Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles (NHC 6.1): Allegory, ascent and ministry in the wake of the decian persecution. e-Publications@Marquette (Thesis). Retrieved February 7, 2023.
  5. ^ Schenke, Hans-Martin (2003). New Testament Apocrypha: Writings relating to the Apostles; Apocalypses and related subjects. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 412–425. ISBN 978-0-664-22722-7. Retrieved March 1, 2023.
  6. ^ a b c d e Schenke 2003, p. 413.
  7. ^ a b Czachesz 2005, p. 485.
  8. ^ Matthew 13:45–46
  9. ^ Smith, Mitzi Jane (January 2002). "The Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles, A Midrash of Matthew 13, 45 – 46?". Apocrypha. 13: 29–52. doi:10.1484/J.APOCRA.2.300397. Retrieved March 1, 2023.
  10. ^ a b Parrott, Douglas M. "Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles". The Coptic encyclopedia, volume 1. Claremont Graduate University. School of Religion. Retrieved March 1, 2023.
  11. ^ Czachesz 2005, p. 487.
  12. ^ Schenke 2003, p. 412–413.
  13. ^ Schenke 2003, p. 414.
  14. ^ Psiroukis, Basile. "Codex VI, papyrus page 9". The Claremont Colleges Digital Library. Claremont Graduate University. Institute for Antiquity and Christianity, School of Religion. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  15. ^ Psiroukis, Basile. "Codex VI, papyrus page 11". The Claremont Colleges Digital Library. Claremont Graduate University. Institute for Antiquity and Christianity, School of Religion. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  16. ^ Meyer, Marvin W.; Robinson, James MacConkey (1977). The Nag Hammadi Library in English. Brill Archive. ISBN 978-90-04-05434-9. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  17. ^ Meyer & Robinson 1977, p. IX.
  18. ^ Meyer & Robinson 1977, p. VI.
  19. ^ Miceli, Calogero A. (March 9, 2016). "Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles". NASSCAL. e-Clavis: Christian Apocrypha. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  20. ^ Parrott & Wilson 1981
  21. ^ Molinari, Andrea Lorenzo (October 26, 2020). The Nag Hammadi Library after Fifty Years: Proceedings of the 1995 Society of Biblical Literature Commemoration. BRILL. pp. 461–483. ISBN 978-90-04-43974-0. Retrieved March 1, 2023.
  22. ^ Robbins, Vernon (1978). Perspectives on Luke-Acts. "By Land and By Sea: The We-Passages and Ancient Sea Voyages". Danville, Va.: Association of Baptist Professors of Religion. pp. 215–242. ISBN 9780932180049. Retrieved March 2, 2023.
  23. ^ Patterson, Stephen J. (March 1991). "Sources, Redaction and Tendenz in the "Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles" (NH VI, 1)". Vigiliae Christianae. 45 (1): 1–17. doi:10.2307/1583755. JSTOR 1583755. Retrieved March 2, 2023.
  24. ^ Molinari 2020, p. 464.
  25. ^ Molinari 2020, p. 465.
  26. ^ a b c Molinari 2020, p. 468.
  27. ^ Molinari 2020, p. 481–483.
  28. ^ Czachesz 2002, p. 159–162.
  29. ^ Czachesz 2002, p. 162.
  30. ^ Czachesz 2002, p. 163–165.
  31. ^ Czachesz 2005, p. 488.
  32. ^ Czachesz 2005, p. 490.
  33. ^ Czachesz 2005, p. 494.
  34. ^ Czachesz 2005, p. 495.
  35. ^ Czachesz 2005, p. 498–501.
  36. ^ a b Schenke 2003, p. 415–416.
  37. ^ Czachesz 2005, p. 491.
  38. ^ Czachesz 2005, p. 493–494.
  39. ^ Batten, Alicia J. (2014). "Thematic Affinities between the Letter of James and the Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles". Christian Apocrypha: Receptions of the New Testament in Ancient Christian Apocrypha (Novum Testamentum Patristicum, 26). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. pp. 247–265. ISBN 978-3525540169. Retrieved March 5, 2023.
  40. ^ a b Batten 2014, p. 252.
  41. ^ Batten 2014, p. 263.

External links[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Acts_of_Peter_and_the_Twelve&oldid=1170106842"