Talk:Interactivity

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 14 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nyderia Smith.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 4 January 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sydj1996.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

discussion about this article

• I'm curious about the Denis McQuail citation in the "Interactivity in New Media" section. There are far more prominent, creditable, and contemporary academics to site in this field (Murray or Manovich off the top of my head).

I won't personally edit or delete the citation, but it seems like a very conspicuous selection to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dakotareese (talk • contribs) 21:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

• how would you feel about merging this article with the article about interaction? Pe3 08:04, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

better not. facopad

I don't thinkl they are the same: this deals with information, the other deals with the idea of interacting parts--Scorpion451 01:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

I have added to the lead paragraph to help explain the forms interactivity takes place in. In human to human communication I added a picture as well as text explaining where the term comes from and what it refers to. In creating interactivity I touch on web interactivity and what that entails, participation is a big part (such as wikipedia!). With everything added there are new citations as well. Sydj1996 (talk) 00:19, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

discussion about interactivity

• what about the levels of interaction?

1) interruption

- how often can you interrupt/continue?

2) selection

- how many options, how often?

3) creative conversation

- interactivity can be viewed as an art because it goes through the process of establishing a connection with the individual user. the user becomes a conscious to the mechanical purpose of the technology.

implementation - users intention to do what should be possible merges as a part of the system

- what she does, affects to what is possible to do

(youngblood 1995 pp.240-241) the first two levels we have now, third one is to come. not soon though. let's have a discussion on this will we? ;)

• what about interactions not happening between a user and a digital device?

for example the interactions happening between users in a multiuser application. Pe3 15:22, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

From the point of view of new media technologies, the nature of interactivity is a specific issue.

Dags 20. jan 2006: Added a section on (human-artefact) interactivity from a somewhat philosophical perspective. Does this fit in with the rest?

Artist called Interactive?

See http://www.discogs.com/artist/Interactive—Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.48.6 (talk • contribs)

Links Interactive Art

why is this subsection EMPTY? should I delete it? Samus uy 02:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)