Talk:Burr (novel)

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I wouldn't mind seeing a discussion of the Gore Vidal book at this page. I wish I could write it, but it's been far too long since I read it. -- Zoe

How odd. I was just about to write the same thing, but Zoe beat me to it. So that's what the edit conflict was about. Danny 03:28 Feb 24, 2003 (UTC)

Thanks, Danny. Isn't Alexander Hamilton the villain in this? -- Zoe

Now that was easy. :-) Danny 03:50 Feb 24, 2003 (UTC)

Move to Burr (novel)[edit]

Shouldn't this page be moved to Burr (novel)? The "A Novel" isn't really part of the title--it's just a description that happens to appear on the cover--and anyway, Burr is what it's commonly referred to anyway.Kurt Weber 20:42, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Jefferson[edit]

In the afterward to Vidal's The Golden Age, he writes that Jefferson's relations with his black slaves have in the meantime been proven by DNA tests.

Burr is a rascal and how anyone can potray him above washington is beyond me, Vidal worships burr's bad manners and praises him as a hero for his wrongdoings.

Actually Aaron Burr had notorious good manners (a fact acknowledged by even his political opponents) I'm not personally a big fan of him as a politician or a political adventurer but you should keep in mind that a goodly portion of the novel in question is written from Aaron's POV. Even if you think of him as a villain its to much to ask that you expect Vidal to have him think of himself as a villain. In addition to that Washington was on the losing side of most battles in the Revolutionary War. The man was a bad general and a good politician. -Anymouse

Historical revisionism[edit]

Hello, are these novels considered to be "revisionist" in any way, or, historically accurate? 76.254.84.27 (talk) 20:32, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it was 100% historically accurate, the book probably would not be considered a novel. MisplacedFate1313 (talk) 22:30, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iconography[edit]

It seems to me that the use of the term "iconography" cannot possibly be correct, as iconography refers specifically to the portrayal of Christian saints in icons or pictures; or perhaps more broadly, religious figures in general. To use this term only subtly supports the historical revisionism that this novel is a part of, which is clearly not NPOV. GrimmC (talk) 02:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, you did not read the same lives of the ~~saints~~ founding fathers as I did in elementary school--"iconography" seems spot on to me. Do you have a specific suggestion for recasting the sentence? --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 10:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Hagiography." 71.161.98.142 (talk) 22:21, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]