Talk:Rights

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as High-importance).

Law Top‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion High‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has previously been nominated to be moved.

Move logs: Right
Rights

Discussions:

RM, Right → Rights, Moved 20 October 2008, 16 May 2006, Talk:Rights/Archive 1#rename to Rights?

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Eringordon. Peer reviewers: KTJeno.

Above undated message substituted from PrimeBOT (talk) 08:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PrimeBOT 102.213.69.68 (talk) 12:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Human rights versus rights[edit]

I can’t help thinking there should be some reference within this page to human rights, which has its own page.

At the moment the two pages are entirely disconnected.

How are rights and human rights related? DouglasBell (talk) 16:40, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Epicgenius talk 16:45, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

thumb

... that Nazism is far right in politics? Source: Fritzsche, Peter. 1998. Germans into nazis. ISBN 978-0674350922, Eatwell, Roger 1997 Fascism, A History. Viking-Penguin. isbn:978-0140257007 pp: xvii-xxiv, 21, 26–31, 114–40, 352
Roger Griffin: Revolution from the Right: Fascism; Parker, David. Revolutions and the Revolutionary Tradition in the West 1560-1991. ISBN 978-0415172950, pp:185–201
- Reviewed:

Created by Ipirangafans (talk). Self-nominated at 07:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Right; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Unfortunately the nomination has to be failed as the article is not eligible for DYK; it is not newly created, has not been expanded 5x, nor has it been promoted to Good Article status. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:01, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reads in parts like personal essay[edit]

Wanted to note/explain templates that parts of this thinly-sourced article aren't very encyclopedic in their prose or examples. Even if some unsourced sections summarize "Main page" articles, other sections could use work. Hoping to get this article rated "B" this month Superb Owl (talk) 00:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]