User talk:A-giau

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi A-giau, and welcome to the English Wikipedia.

Thankyou for finding the time to sign up and contribute to our little project. If you're in doubt about anything, you might want to check out the Help centre, the FAQs, or the Manual of Style; otherwise, don't hesitate to ask questions at my talk page, or at the Village Pump.

It's also a good idea to sign the new user log and add a little about yourself.


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.


Have fun!

TPK 23:47, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)

black pudding[edit]

Hello:

I don't think "Zhu-Xue-Gao" isn't Blood Pudding, it's totally different. And it is also more far away from german "blutwurst". Maybe we can create any page calls "Taiwanese blach pudding", and also translate "black pudding" into chinese wikipedia.Richyli 04:54, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Usage statistics for Minnan[edit]

I wasn't active on Wikipedia for a while, so sorry for the late reply. You might have already gotten the issue sorted, but in any case, I am not a developer so I don't really know. It might be that it just hasn't been scheduled for stats yet since it's one of the newer wikis. If you still need to know the answer, I would suggest asking on the Village pump or drop me another note and I'll find out from someone. Dori | Talk 23:25, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing[edit]

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Zh-minnan interwikis[edit]

So, what's the current situation with the Minnanhua interwikis? It looks like some guy went through and changed a bunch of them from Roman letters to Hanzi. But, since the wiki in question is in Roman letters, shouldn't the interwiki be, too? What's the proper form for minnan interwikis? I'm asking you because I figured you would know. Is this being discussed more thoroughly somewhere else? Thanks - Nat Krause 16:47, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Hi, Nat. The change appears to be accidental. Seems that the recent upgrade to MediaWiki 1.4 used an old file for interwiki names, so all the interwikis reverted to the old and mismatching form. A bug report has been filed [1]. Lets hope Brion and the other developers will have a bit of time to fix this. Accidents like this not withstanding, they've done a good job. A-giau 05:35, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
It's fixed! A-giau 03:07, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Japan-related topics in Min-nan[edit]

I posted on the talk page of Kunrei-shiki asking if speakers of Bân-lâm-gú usually romanize Japanese words and names using the Kunrei-shiki method (Anglophones use Hepburn) and a poster there says that Min-nan does not have a standard method for romanizing Japanese names.

Does Min-Nan have a standard? WhisperToMe 04:23, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)


Source page licensing[edit]

Thanks for your comments, I will (by degrees) as soon as possible alter the license statements on my [Home Pages]. In the interum, I would like to have this statement of intent stand as record that all original images I have posted are license free. L-Bit 02:17, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Chinese surnames[edit]

Hi A-giau,

I noticed that you were originally the one that added the Minnan pronunciations to List of common Chinese surnames. Ran recently added surnames 81-100. When you get the chance, do you think you can add the Minnan pronunciations for those as well? Thanks! --Umofomia 18:40, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Taiwanese People's Party[edit]

I asked for some references at Talk:Taiwanese People's Party. – Kaihsu 18:18, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

User Categorization[edit]

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Taiwan page as living in or being associated with Taichung County. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Taichung County for instructions. Rmky87 20:54, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review/Yuan (surname)[edit]

If you have a minute, could you take a look at the article Yuan (surname) - I've put it up for peer review (see Wikipedia:Peer review/Yuan (surname)/archive1). I hope to make it a model for expanding other Chinese surname articles. Since you've contributed to the Chinese surname article, I would really appreciate your suggestions. Yu Ninjie 21:57, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Star TV (not STAR!)[edit]

Hi there, I have answered your question some time ago in Talk:Star TV. I know, it's sad to be ignored for 4 months =P 199.111.230.195 18:14, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Issue with uploaded image[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Copyright_issues concerning Image:Return of the King (Tokyo).jpg which you have uploaded. __meco 15:30, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tiptree[edit]

You asked for some more detail on James Tiptree, Jr's works. I added this section - let me know if you have suggestions... ←Hob 11:17, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help with the Atayal page.--Ling.Nut 18:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mention it. Hopefully someone knowledgeable will address facial tatooing. A-giau 06:09, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Atayal is looking better and better. Good job.
  • If you wanna devote time to the article, it would help to find references for the many uncited assertions. Also, those embedded links need to have full text cites in the reference section. Ican help you with one or two...--Ling.Nut 15:33, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • PS there are lots of examples of citing newspapers and websites in Taiwanese aborigines, especially in the bottom sections (Modern Aborigines). You can use those for examples...--Ling.Nut 15:37, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've converted one to formal citation. Thanks for the reminder. A-giau 08:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You rock!--Ling.Nut 12:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Alas, I have not the time to do much here at en: :( A-giau 14:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rate on quality scale[edit]

Hi, I am working on Taiwanese opera and trying to expand it.I saw you are also interested about this topic.if you think what needs to add in this article. Please give me some comments.I would like to ask you to watch that article and rate on the scope of Wikiproject Taiwan or give me some opinions or comments on this article. Thanks Qwaszxfish (talk) 04:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Substantial edits at the Dorje Shugden article[edit]

Dear editor I like to draw your attention to that specific article, Dorje Shugden, which was substantially changed by a group of three new editors, without any discussion on the talk page. Rather one of the new editor revealed: "Many of these changes were discussed between at least three of the editors." which must have happened outside of WP, because there is no discussion on the talk page or their WP-accounts. One of the new editors claimed: "You seem to be the only person who accepted this article as it was. If you check you will see that the changes made make this article more neutral and unbiased then it was before previous edits." If I check I see the article omitted different POV's, deleted verified passages, included passages from anonymous websites and turned the article to a more bias Pro-Shugden POV. I'd like to ask you to check that and to give your opinion or to collaborate if there is a need for improving the article, so that we can have an unbiased, neutral, well-informed article which fairly presents all POV's. Thank you very much, --Kt66 (talk) 19:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to translate English material to Taiwanese?[edit]

Hi A-giau,

I'm wondering if you would be available to help out the Spread Open Media project by translating some content to Taiwanese? Feel free to reply on my talk page or via email.--Ivo talk / contribs (join Project Portugal) 11:12, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC that you may be interested in...[edit]

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (tec) 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, A-giau. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, A-giau. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, A-giau. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Min Nan Wikipedia[edit]

Hello, I wanted to ask you a question about Min Nan grammatical rules. Sorry if this sounds weird, but my real question is about Min Nan Wikipedia and technical restrictions of page names. I have noticed that on all but one Wikipedias, all titles start with a capital letter. Note that iPad is technically IPad, as it will have an uppercase I in the URL. However, zh-min-nan:File:Example.jpg will say https://zh-min-nan.wikipedia.org/wiki/tóng-àn:Example.jpg. Entering a capital T instead of a lowercase one will give the same result, as prefixes are not case sensitive. But the lowercase t is default, and no titles start with actual lowercase letters, except on Wiktionary. Titles in Wikipedia almost never begin with lowercase letters, so is this a grammatical thing or something? Gioguch (talk) 20:55, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Both “tóng-àn” and “Tóng-àn” are okay. I suppose namespace should be in sentence case? Kaihsu (talk) 10:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request translation Isabelle de Charrière[edit]

Hello A-giau, Would you like to write / translate the article of Isabelle de Charrière (Q123386) for the Minnan wikipedia or find someone else to do that? That would be appreciated. Boss-well63 (talk) 14:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Cobian Backup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. There are no independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]