User talk:Slac

Welcome to the Wikipedia[edit]

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Sam Spade 07:16, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Generally[edit]

I am prepared to consider writing one or two stand-alone, introductory pages that would form the basis of an explanation for some of the material in the pages that I've worked on. The structuralism page isn't too bad but there is nothing on paradigmatic analysis so that would be a good place to start. The material on semiotics is somewhat superficial as are the subelements on particular individuals. . . Why don't you e-mail me and we can try to agree a strategy for pooling resources on aesthetics and semiotics, and ethics (which I taught for a year or two some twenty years ago). --David91 18:07, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Stubs[edit]

I am glad I could help with moving Aesthetics to the proper stub template (it is just part of the service from WP:WSS). Based upon your area of interest, you may be interested in knowing about {{Philo-stub}}, the template for philosophy stubs, for your future endeavors. --Allen3 ^talk July 2, 2005 18:06 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Moral_Philosophy[edit]

Hello. I am writing to inform you that I have created Wikiproject Moral Philosophy and you are invited to join. We are in need of more editors, and your help would be greatly appreciated. Cheers! --Malathion 08:21, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Small Cow-Related Note[edit]

Puns concerning cows are quite entertaining.

Tautology[edit]

You are of course right. There is a difference. Do we need to list both in the article though? Andycjp 6th August 2005

Wikimedia struct/mergist[edit]

Answered your question in you wikimedia user page :) Sjschen 17:10, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Function composition[edit]

I reverted this diff: [1] because I can't see what the summary "removed confusing paragraph about commutativity -- see discussion page" is referring to. Feel free to reply here or anywhere. –EdC 05:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the very bottom of the relevant talk page where users are expressing their confusion. --Slac 05:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah... that was about the example; you could have removed the example and left the rest of the paragraph. I've replaced it with a simpler example. –EdC 06:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Quetzalcoatl (Stargate) 1.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Quetzalcoatl (Stargate) 1.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TIME cover Cowboy Diplomacy 2006.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:TIME cover Cowboy Diplomacy 2006.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Forward exchange market for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Forward exchange market is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forward exchange market until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 01:39, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aesthetics has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Aesthetics has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 17:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]