Talk:Matthew effect

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Matthew effect article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 2 years

Text and/or other creative content from Matthew effect (sociology) was copied or moved into Matthew effect (education) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from Matthew effect (education) was copied or moved into Matthew effect (sociology) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Political science[edit]

Liberalization in autocracies is more likely to succeed in countries with the advantage of a better starting point concerning political institutions, GDP, and education. These more developed countries can also carry out key reforms more rapidly, and are able to do so even in areas with no initial advantage.^[1] PzychoPat (talk) 16:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Lindenfors, Patrik; Wilson, Matthew; Lindberg, Staffan I. (2020-09-25). "The Matthew effect in political science: head start and key reforms important for democratization". Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 7 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1057/s41599-020-00596-7. ISSN 2662-9992.

Uh Oh[edit]

1. There is no such thing as AI, and
2. Even if there were, statements like "... representative, and free from biases ..." are innately paradoxical, humans being innately biased. Choose one, abandon the other. They're mutually exclusive. Do you want "free from bias" (unrepresentative) or "representative" (biased)? 122.151.210.84 (talk) 16:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
3. I'd like to add that the source doesn't explicitely mention "Another study found that a hiring algorithm was biased against women" in any shape or way, it points out the unbalance in classes, but does not provide balancing from the sample data, which is needed before training a machine learning model. Please remove the source or change the paragraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfredoespinozapelayo (talk • contribs) 01:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Etymology section false[edit]

The etymology section suggests that the etymology is based on the synoptic gospels, when clearly it is based on the gospel of Matthew.

There is a confused conflation between allegations and analysis of the gospel texts and the effect, and the etymology.

The etymology section therefore needs rewriting. Coalsoffire (talk) 06:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Lindenfors, Patrik; Wilson, Matthew; Lindberg, Staffan I. (2020-09-25). "The Matthew effect in political science: head start and key reforms important for democratization". Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 7 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1057/s41599-020-00596-7. ISSN 2662-9992.

[1]