Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sclerosponges

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 06:44, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sclerosponges[edit]

A VfD incorrectly submitted by Oberiko. I'm just listing it correctly and not voting. -- Longhair | Talk 16:24, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Rather ugly substub but could be made better and is linked from Sponge. DoubleBlue (Talk) 16:38, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Is "folded inner body" the right definition? From googling, it seems more to do with having coral-like skeletons. Kappa 17:22, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, expand. ✏ OvenFresh ² 21:58, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. Megan1967 03:46, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's apparently a new (as of 1970) biological classification of sponges. LSNED. --Unfocused 04:35, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable form of sponge. I wonder if Sponge Bob is a schlerosponge, Capitalistroadster 11:38, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- I will add a taxobox and straighten it up a bit. --DanielCD 15:26, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.