User talk:HenryLi

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Graham ☺ | Talk 13:49, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Current events[edit]

Hi hello, would you be interested to contribute to Current events in Hong Kong and Macao? You may also be interested to take a look at Wikipedia:HK wikipedians' notice board. best, — Instantno od 12:01, Feb 5 2005 (UTC)

Chinese names[edit]

Hello. I saw an abundancy of Chinese names had been speard out in the articles after your editing. Tsing Yi is a very good example. The way you add the Chinese names in paratheses, however, is sometimes tedious to readers. I suggest you should:

Use an English tranliteration or pinyin instead of a Chinese name:

e.g. Chinese name was changed to 嶺南學堂 ===> Chinese name was changed to Lingnan Xuetang (嶺南學堂)

Hide up X's Chinese name if this is not the MAIN ARTICLE of X.

Though Chinese names are sometimes necessary to show previous phrases are sheer translation.

e.g. :The motto of Sun Yat-sen University is "Study extensively; Enquire accurately; Reflect carefully; Discriminate clearly; Practise earnestly" (博學、審問、慎思、明辨、篤行).

I hope this brief guideline would help you in your further editing. :-D -- Jerry Crimson Mann 5 July 2005 13:37 (UTC)

Certainly you can. Another way to make the article to look neater, though, is to add: < ! - - - - XXXX - - - - -> -- Jerry Crimson Mann 5 July 2005 14:16 (UTC)

When others are dealing with unwikified articles, they still can see those Chinese names in the editing page. -- Jerry Crimson Mann 5 July 2005 14:16 (UTC)

lit.[edit]

Hi! Seen you have used lit. like this in several times:

CHINESENAME, lit. CHINESELIT.

lit. is an abbreviation, and the way you use it in declarative sentences is undesirable. Here're two ways I sugget you follow:

CHINESENAME (lit. CHINESELIT).
CHINESENAME, which literally means CHINESELIT.

Find me if you have a question or disagreement. :-) -- Jerry Crimson Mann 9 July 2005 16:00 (UTC)

Hey, Henery Li. Dun be shy even if your English is not that good. Be bold at all times! I see your patent endeavour, and please continue with your excellent contribution. ttyl 'cos I'm rather busy with my future studies right now... ;-) -- Jerry Crimson Mann 15:26, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good one: CHINESENAME (CHINESECHARACTER, lit. "CHINESELIT") :-D -- Jerry Crimson Mann 16:32, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hakka : I [ŋai₁₁][edit]

Thanks for adding the Unicode 4/Ext.B character 𠊎 in the Hakka (linguistics) page. I didn't think it was there, but now I'm very pleased it can be represented as a single character. Dylanwhs 23:51, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The map for UC and RC[edit]

Hello Henry thanks so much for preparing the map and it looks really nice. :-D — Insta ntnood 20:06, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

Map for Kwai Tsing District constituencies[edit]

The map is so great. :-) — Insta ntnood 07:28, September 11, 2005 (UTC)

Ah yes it's electoral, not electorial. :-) — Insta ntnood 07:29, September 11, 2005 (UTC)

Can you create similar maps for other districts too? :-D — Insta ntnood 13:16, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Double redirects[edit]

Please be reminded to fix double redirects after you've moved a page. Thank you. :-) — Insta ntnood 13:16, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of Hong Kong-related topics[edit]

Hello. Please be reminded to add new articles to the list. :-D — Insta ntnood 16:27, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tartan track[edit]

See tarmac vs. tartan ^ ^v. freshgavin 05:11, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See my reply

My apologies! They may be the 'leaders in track surfacing for 50 years' but I hadn't heard of them : ). Thanks for pointing out my mistake. freshgavin ^TALK 23:45, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New stub types[edit]

You may be interested to take a look at WP:WSS, WP:WSS/P, WP:WSS/D and WP:WSS/C. Underpopulated stub types could be deleted. :-) — Insta ntnood 16:06, 22 October 2005 (UTC) Replied[reply]

Of course I'd help populate them. Meanwhile please be reminded to file it at WP:WSS/D. For the next time please propose at WP:WSS/P first before creating one. Thanks. :-D — Insta ntnood 16:17, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Remember to do so next time.. :-) — Insta ntnood 16:26, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SYS FARC[edit]

I've nomintated Sun Yat-sen for featured article removal. Since you originally participated in the nomination discussion, your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Sun Yat-sen. --Ji ang 08:19, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

responded there. --Ji[[User talk:Jiang|ang]] 21:06, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thirteen Factories[edit]

Please take a look at (and make edits if you have time) the new article, Thirteen Factories. Thank you very much! Joaquin Murietta 08:02, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

- Your edits are superb! This article is coming along real well. Thank you Joaquin Murietta 15:45, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Henry Pottinger[edit]

Henry Li -

I appreciate the addition of my Great Gt Gt Gt grandfathers names to his son Sir Henry Pottinger, but what you have done is incorrect. His name is Henry Pottinger - without any additional names. If you have information to the contrary I am always willing to discuss it.

I have been researching my family for over 30 years and evidence such as you are suggesting has never come to light.

For further information please contact me at pabriggs@netspace.net.au .

Paul Briggs (Pottinger Family)

Replied

Punti-Hakka Clan Wars[edit]

Hello Jerry you may be interested to take a look at a complete rewrite [1] to the article on the Punti-Hakka Clan Wars. — Insta ntnood 07:59, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kung hei fat choi[edit]

Hello Henry. The article is now nominated to be moved to gong xi fa cai. You may be interested to take a look there. :-) — Insta ntnood 14:05, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

After turning into a disambiguation..[edit]

After moving a page, and turn the redirect into a disambiguation, don't forget to clear up the links to it. :-D — Insta ntnood 19:29, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that. Sometimes it does turn out to be interesting discovery, and help expand the disambiguation page. — Insta ntnood 20:14, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Preview, please[edit]

It is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. -- SoothingR^(pour) 15:17, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Huaiwei[edit]

You may wish to comment at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Huaiwei. enochlau (talk) 14:30, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation in English[edit]

Hi, I saw your edit in Hong Kong Government Cantonese Romanisation.

As far as I can remember, when pronounced in English (e.g., in MTR station announcements), they are aspirated and released—I certainly remember they being pronounced released (not unreleased as in real Cantonese). But since I am no longer living in Hong Kong, I cannot easily double-check this part. (Or perhaps I can tune in to RTHK on the 'net and listen to the news for a few hours to verify.)

I wonder if you really mean that right now they are pronounced unreleased when pronounced in English, or you just changed it by accident.—Gniw (Wing) 04:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Replied

Hi. I think if you are referring to the 粵音韻彙, you are thinking about the real Cantonese sounds. (In real Cantonese, the final stops are unaspirated and unreleased.) However, in English (when spoken by an English person, not a Chinese person), I doubt very much that they are unaspirated. Please remember that when speaking in English the words are not pronounced like Cantonese, and I am referring to the standard English, non-Cantonese pronunciation.

I have underestimated the time needed for the RTHK test. I think if I try to verify this myself I will have to listen to RTHK Radio 3 for several days or maybe even a few weeks.

I think a quicker way to verify this is for someone in Hong Kong (perhaps you can do it) to listen to the MTR station annouoncements carefully when the train goes to such stations as Mong Kok, Lai Chi Kok, Lok Fu, Ngau Tau Kok, or Shek Kip Mei; basically, if you can hear “k” and “p” without thinking and you haven't learnt French (or some other non-English foreign language), then it is very likely that they are actually pronounced aspirated.

(Note: Thanks for the pointer, but I already know what aspiration is :-)—Gniw (Wing) 06:52, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have not tested the final stop by checking whether it gives my hand a strong flow of air because

it is unnecessary, as if it is aspirated you will be able to hear the difference without the test;
it is irrelevant, as it would only test whether in my accent whether the final stop is aspirated or not.

I still stand by my statement that, as far as I can remember, what I actually heard had aspirated final stops. This has nothing to do with how I (or you) speak it, unless either of us claim to be a native English speaker, and then claim that we are speaking these words in the official accent in MTR/RTHK/the government etc.

However, I accept the point pointed by the articles you mention, that in some dialects these stops may be unaspirated, unreleased, and/or glottalized. I will change the paragraph in question.

I don't know why I am editing these articles. I should be out of here. Bye.—Gniw (Wing) 15:31, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified image[edit]

File:Building in HK.jpg

Unidentified building

Hi there, I saw your edits on Lippo Centre, and I was wondering if you'd be able to help me with this photo. The Bank of China Building is in the reflection, so it's pretty close by. Does it have a name, or is it just a random office block? I don't live in HK, so I can't just pop off to check what it is. :) Thanks. enochlau (talk) 12:04, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied

Many thanks. enochlau (talk) 03:20, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scouting in Mainland China[edit]

Hello, there are some hints on active Scout groups in Mainland China. Please have a look at Talk:Scouting in Mainland China#Actual situation. YiS --jergen 10:43, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Water resource references for Hong Kong[edit]

Hello! I'm a masters student in London and doing a project on water sustainability in HK (I was in HK last year and fell in love with it!). There's great data in the HK water resources page, but I couldn't find the original sources. Do you have any idea where these figures came from? Thanks... as I may not get back to this page I can be reached at dennis.moynihan@kcl.ac.uk

Edit summary[edit]

Do use more edit summaries when making major edits such as creating a new article, or minor edits i.e. spelling, grammar and copyediting. Thanks for cooperating. --Ter e nc e Ong 13:58, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Site of Special Scientifc Interest[edit]

From article mentioned just above:

03:55, 1 March 2006 HenryLi m (moved Site of Special Special Scientifc Interest to Site of Special Scientifc Interest: correct typo)

Shouldn't that be Scientific, even? o_O -- Jobjörn 03:19, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geographic references changes on 25 February 2006[edit]

Is there reason why you alter the look of Geographic references pages? The reason why I'm asking is that you got rid of the <sup id="#">#</sup> tags which were used by many Wikipedia articles. For instance, if you go to the Boston article and go down to the "Demographics" section and click on the "GR2" next to the word census, then you will just go to Geographic references page but that is it. Prior to your change, the browser would would have stop at 2 The United States Census Bureau's 2000 census data. Much of the geographic and demographic information for the U.S. states.... --J. Nguyen 00:02, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tai O Road[edit]

Re: [2]

I'm not familiar with the place, so I was just making a guess as to what you meant. The sentence is still not clear and grammatical; do you mean:

it starts at the top of the hill, or
it starts halfway down the side of a hill (divide the hill into top and bottom portions), or
it starts halfway across the hill (divide the hill into left and right portions), or

"Middle of the hill", to me, sounds as if the road is underground and begins in the ground, which I don't think you mean. Let me know what you think. enochlau (talk) 15:36, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I hope this is better now :) enochlau (talk) 00:07, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The map about Central and Western District of Hong Kong[edit]

It's quite ugly anyway. Just delete it. --JuntungWu 09:23, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Wikimedia Conference 2006[edit]

All Hong Kong Wikipedians are cordially invited to come and help the preparation of Chinese Wikimedia Conference 2006 * Hong Kong Taskforce(In Chinese)! Will you join?

*Official name has not yet confirmed -- Alfred.Yeung 05:49, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pyinmana / Naypyidaw[edit]

Would you have a look on the articles of Pyinmana and Naypyidaw? They are two different names of the new capital of Myanmar. These two articles are so confusing.... (Though they are irrelevant to Hong Kong, I think we should be concerned about it.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Splee (talk • contribs) 14:37, 16 April 2006

Ngau Tau Kok[edit]

I would like to point out that Ping Shek Est and Shun Lee Est are belonged to Kwun Tong District, Ngau Tau Kok is the general name of these places in there. Also, the place where Shun Lee Estate located is also namely Jordon Valley, but not Ngau Chi Wan. Ngau Chi Wan should be referred to the place such as Choi Wan and Ngau Chi Wan Village also Ngau Chi Wan is in Wong Tai Sin District.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Modotcom (talk • contribs) 9:37, 21 April 2006

Thanks very much for your explaination. Some points of view of mine might contradict with yours. I guess the definition of district boundary not just only in dividing the place for ease the election but also to eliminate the arguments of the naming of the place. I am agree with you that sometimes some boundaries are little bit nonsense, but the division methods that the government used can minimize the arguments as well as make the administration much easiler. Furthermore, the history is the good reference to determine the names of the places but it is not the only way to do so. For example, the MTR renamed part of the places, but it doesn't mean that the rename by the MTR company is wrong. Similar situation in district boundaries given by the government.

Finally, sorry for any inconvenient caused and your great efforts in Wikipedia should be appreciated. Please keep it up. =)

— Modotcom (Talk) 03:20, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brook Bernacchi[edit]

I have not found a single reference online that refers to Brook Bernacchi as Brook Antony Bernacchi. While I do not doubt that this is his real middle name, I think it is more important to have the main article under the name for which he became known. This is quite common as you can see here, for example, in the article on George W. Bush. What do you think? My suggestion is to call the article Brook Bernacchi but keep his middle name in the article, similar to the article on President Bush. --Ghormax 20:31, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brook Bernacchi's real name is Brook Antony Bernacchi but in the press he became known without the middle-name. This is the same as George W. Bush, whose name is George Walker Bush, or even people like John Wayne, whose real name was Marion Mitchell Morrison. I just think his main entry should be under the name for which he became known, but the article can also mention his middle-name. I suggest moving the article back to Brook Bernacchi but leaving the text unchanged. What do you think? --Ghormax 08:16, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Middle Chinese[edit]

Hi, I was wondering where you got your reconstructions of Middle Chinese pronunciation. — Gulliver ✉ 16:38, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese naming conventions[edit]

I just made a new proposal on NPOV treatment of the different Chinese languages/dialects on the Chinese naming conventions. Please take a look and comment if you will. Thanks.--Yuje 19:33, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SCMP[edit]

Please help deal with user:Alanmak with the South China Morning Post article [3]. Thanks. — Insta ntnood 22:41, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		Here, a barnstar for your hard work on Hong Kong related topics, epspecially the list. You deserve it. :) deadkid_dk 20:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Standard Cantonese[edit]

Sorry... it looks like I clobbered some of the changes you made while I was converting everything into table format here. I noticed you removed 蚊 and converted the pronunciation to IPA. Concerning the former, it is accepted that 蚊 is indeed derived from the first syllable of money. It's listed at this site plus I remember seeing it in another source I can't recall at the moment. Concerning the latter, I don't have a strong preference what type of transcription is used for the pronunciation though most pages on Wikipedia appear to transcribe Cantonese in either Jyutping or Yale anyway (plus it seems most people interested in Cantonese don't read IPA as well as the other romanization schemes). —Umofomia 07:13, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied User talk:Umofomia#Standard Cantonese. — HenryLi (Talk) 15:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I couldn't find the source on 蚊 either so we can leave it out. The list already has several examples anyway. I agree with you on the IPA; the only concern is that especially for the loanwords section, it's hard to see how the Cantonese pronunciation maps to the word being exported or imported. To make this clearer, IPA should be used for the exported/imported language as well. —Umofomia 06:07, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My two cents. I'd say IPA and Yale would be the most useful on the English-language version of Wikipedia. Jyutping could be preferable since it's the most easy to input. A modified version of IPA is used by scholars like Richard Ho and his colleagues at CUHK for teaching. The schemes used by Chinese dictionaries published in Hong Kong greatly vary, even if they claim they're using more or less the same scheme. — Insta ntnood 13:03, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Yuen Long[edit]

I think Yuen Long does not mean Yuen Long Town, because I know that Yuen Long is include Pang Shan, Tin Shui Wai, Kam Tin etc.--AP71 13:08, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's Yuen Long District. Hoi Ha isn't part of Tai Po but Tai Po District. — Insta ntnood 13:46, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know what Yuen Long meaning for? Yuen Long is meaning that an area which have hills enclose circular--AP71 14:45, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing, where do you live?--AP71 14:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

算了吧，我用中文打吧，元朗原本是寫左圓塱，因為在元朗舊墟望過去，你會見到一座座山以半圓圍繞著一塊開朗的平地，而這塊平地包括天水圍、十八鄉、大棠等總面積達144平方公里的地方。所以才會叫作圓塱，之後就簡化作元朗這個名字。(這段資料可以在[4]找到)--AP71 15:50, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

元朗 often refers to Yuen Long Town (元朗市 or 元朗墟). The broader area that you're referring to, which includes places like Shap Pat Heung, is often known in modern times as Yuen Long Plain (元朗平原). The modern Yuen Long District covers Ha Tsuen, Kam Tin, Pat Heung, Ngau Tam Mei, Shek Kong, San Tin, Lau Fau Shan, Ngau Hom Shek, etc. — Insta ntnood 16:54, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To Henry,| The area of the plains that I found is come from this.[5] Also when you type 元朗平原 and search, you can find the information, too!^^--AP71 17:27, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To Instantnood,| In nowadays, most Hong Kong people have mix Yuen Long Town or Yuen Long up--AP71 17:32, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned, 元朗 often refers to 元朗市. When people says 元朗 they're probably referring to 元朗市, which Long Ping Estate, Yuen Long Industrial Estate, Tung Tau Industrial Area, etc., aren't part of. Less often they may mean the entire Yuen Long District (元朗區). — Insta ntnood 19:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, may be we should not use Yuen Long this word, because we can not understand that it should be Yuen Long District, Yuen Long Town or Yuen Long Plain--AP71 10:13, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

之前諗過，其實“元朗市”係指元朗市中心之意，即係話原本元朗並唔係只係指市鎮--AP71 17:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion[edit]

Hello! I noticed that you have been a contributor to articles on Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. You may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand Anglican-related articles! Cheers! Fishhead64 22:07, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong, China[edit]

Please be informed there's currently a non-binding straw poll on whether an article specifically focuses on the designation (in other words, terminology) should exist, at talk:Hong Kong. — Insta ntnood 17:02, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[6] - Thank you. — Insta ntnood 20:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the article has been expanded [7]. Do any further expansion you wish if you think it's necessary. — Insta ntnood 20:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

only telling something[edit]

haha, does it have relationship on the town and WWF?--AP71 13:29, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied.— HenryLi (Talk) 13:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because your concept is wrong--AP71 14:44, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

只係說給你聽, 元朗並不等於市鎮 (請用中文回答) --AP71 14:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

算了吧, 既然你我各持己見, 我還是不會再修改關於Yuen Long的文章了--AP71 15:27, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied — HenryLi (Talk) 15:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chau_Tsai.png[edit]

Please correct the wrong spelling of the name of the island at the title.--Tomchiukc 07:53, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Busy Yuen Long Town.jpg[edit]

When did you take this photo?thx^^--203.218.162.216 06:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In 2003. (It'd better that you get an account to discuss) ^_^.

Request for edit summary[edit]

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries when you contribute. Thanks, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 19:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply. The browser submit when accidentally pressing enter key. It committed to database before it could be stopped. — HenryLi (Talk) 01:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happens rather often I guess. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sheng Kung Hui[edit]

Hello, I see you've done some work on the article Sheng Kung Hui and I had a question (or two). First of all, while I was researching for Province 8 of ECUSA, I found that in Taiwan, the Episcopal diocese there is also known as Taiwan Sheng Kung Hui. Would it therefore make sense to move the current SKH article to Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui? There could then be a brief page at SKH which could provide a translation and point to HKSKH and TSKH.

Speaking of translation, what is the best translation of Sheng Kung Hui? I've seen "Anglican Church" and "Episcopal Church", but I really don't know what is accurate. Also, could you confirm that Taiwan Sheng Kung Hui = 臺灣聖公會. Many thanks. --Wine Guy Talk 01:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply, as I am not knowledgeable in the chinese language and usage it is very helpful. I will leave the article for Sheng Kung Hui where it is. When I write the article for Episcopal Diocese of Taiwan, I will make a small note to direct anyone looking for Taiwan Sheng Kung Hui. --Wine Guy Talk 07:45, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Piers[edit]

Hello, HenryLi I noticed your interest in piers by your contributions to the Category:Piers in Hong Kong article. You are cordially invited to join WikiProject Piers, which is an attempt to better organize and unify articles relating to piers. If you would like to participate you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.--Paul E. Ester 13:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hong Kong (PRC)[edit]

Guess you must be interested to take a part to decide whether this template should stay. :-) — Insta ntnood 21:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Current events in Hong Kong and Macao[edit]

Would you prefer to have Hong Kong "inheriting" the original joint project, or to have two new projects created, with the original joint project serving as archive of both new projects? Join the discussion here. — Insta ntnood 21:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GCCS[edit]

I have moved the content of your article GCCS to HKSCS. For details, please read the dicusssion of HKSCS at Chinese wikipedia.--Tomchiukc 18:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick Stewart[edit]

The correct way to disambiguate the two Frederick Stewarts is to call the Australian one Frederick Stewart (Australian politician) and the Hong Kong one Frederick Stewart (colonial governor), and to make Frederick Stewart a disambiguation page - not to use middle names. Please move the articles accordingly. Adam 07:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

say hi from c_o[edit]

hi Henry,

seems that you have been working entries on hong kong. so are you from hong kong? i am a hong kong-er. nice to meet you.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by C_o (talk • contribs)

nice to meet you. hi Henry, i've uploaded some photos under the { { PD-self|Jansen } } license via another account in zh.wikipedia, so it will appear in here? --C o 02:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1st Preliminary meeting of Wikimedia Hong Kong[edit]

HenryLi ：

The 1st Preliminary meeting of Wikimedia Hong Kong, will be held in City Express within CityU at 19.00 on 16^th September , 2006.

The Hong Kong Wikipedians who attend the meeting, will be regarded as members of the Preliminary Committee. For further information, please refer to the agenda.

Yours Turly,
encyclopedist 20:05, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Housing estates in Hong Kong[edit]

I notice that you have created some articles, and are also removing some of the {prod} tags which I placed. For your information, a proposer is not obliged to notify the creator of an article's deletion, and lack of notification is not a valid reason for contesting a prod.

You may be aware that housing estates are not generally regarded as notable in wikipedia as failing WP:N, and they are easily deleted for the reason that there are usually few "multiple, non-trivial, reliable published works" - in particular, news or research items available (other than government sources). I feel the vast majority of stubs you created will eventually be deleted because there will never be sufficient material of real encyclopaedic interest to fill an article.

Kindly take a look at the changes I have made to List of public housing estates in Hong Kong and List of Home Ownership Scheme Courts in Hong Kong. I have incorporated much of the information which you have in the stubs you are interested in, and I hope this will be more useful to people who look up here. I have also moved the links to many of the photographs of public housing estate to a gallery on the main article, and hope you will not continue to oppose deletion of the pages of housing estates nominated. Ohconfucius 02:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Broadview Garden, Serene Garden and Ching Nga Court[edit]

I've nominated Broadview Garden, Serene Garden and Ching Nga Court, articles you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Broadview Garden, Serene Garden and Ching Nga Court satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broadview Garden and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Broadview Garden, Serene Garden and Ching Nga Court during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

WikiProject Hong Kong[edit]

Dear User:HenryLi,

Thank you for your contributions to Hong Kong-related articles!

You are invited to join WikiProject Hong Kong - a collaborative effort to improve the quality and scope of all Hong Kong-related articles. If your interested in improving more Hong Kong-related articles, visit the WikiProject Hong Kong homepage. Alternatively, sign up and start contributing right away by putting signing your username with four tildes (~~~~), on the bottom of the participants list.

Looking forward to working with you! Luke! 17:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lighthouses in Bermuda[edit]

I think that you should delete the category that you just created because there are only two lighthouses in Bermuda. It's not much of a category. I am changing the Gibbs Hill Lighthouse to be under Category:Lighthouses again. SeanMD80^{talk | contribs} 18:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that. Never mind. SeanMD80^{talk | contribs} 18:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lighthouses in Hong Kong[edit]

Could you mind moving the category to Category:Lighthouses in China instead of Category:Lighthouses by country? Hong Kong is just one part of China but not a country. Shrimp wong 03:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A bug with your AWB?[edit]

Refer to this edit: [8]. Did your AWB have a bug that made it unable to identify currently existent WPHK or WikiProjectHongKong templates? --Der yck C. 11:48, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somehow I wished I were not an HKBN user. HKBN rotates its IP and therefore many a time I am blocked due to collateral damage even when I've logged in. I need to use proxies to solve this problem. As a result, I cannot use AWB. --Der yck C. 13:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW what software and what base map did you use to draw the Tsing Yi map? --Der yck C. 13:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How often? Irregular. Sometimes I can hold an IP for a month. Sometimes I get rotated twice a day. The collateral damages is that, since there are so many people using the same computer, many a vandal work behind them, many HKBN IPs are blocked as open proxies or zombies. --Der yck C. 13:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You mean the PDF map from the District Council website? --Der yck C. 13:59, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling. --Der yck C. 14:08, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Li Move[edit]

I think the article cash (unit) should move to Chinese wen. Are you ok with that? Benjwong 22:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of International Christian School[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on International Christian School, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because International Christian School seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting International Christian School, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:02, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding International Christian School[edit]

Hi, sorry for the misunderstanding, but I did not nominate this article for speedy deletion nor did I delete it. My bot only notifies article creator's of speedy deletion nominations. Since it is already deleted there isn't anything I can do unfourtunately. If such a thing happens again, try to place the hangon template on the article in question as soon as possible to avoid an admin deleting it. --Android Mouse 22:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

James Dyer Ball[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article James Dyer Ball, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.129.6.177 15:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

non-commercial use only[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Hong_Kong_Croton.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[9][10]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 19:24, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AsiaWorld-Expo.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AsiaWorld-Expo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of 2the Max[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 2the Max, by Kww (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 2the Max seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 2the Max, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can't undelete[edit]

I can't undelete the article because I didn't delete it. I simply added a tag because the article didn't provide any reason to believe that 2theMax is notable. An admin (that does have the power to delete articles) looked over a list of tagged articles, and agreed with me. There were no references to newspaper articles about it, or any other indication that any reliable source of information had ever noticed them. Find those articles, reference them, add them to the article, and then submit it. Kww 11:59, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do follow process quite strictly: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedy_deletion documents it. Basically, you have to meet minimum article standards for your article to be kept. I didn't think yours did, so I tagged it with "db-bio", because not only had you not demonstrated notability, you hadn't even provided a single reason to guess that it might be notable. An administrator agreed. Nothing prevents you from recreating the article after you have addressed the problem. Kww 15:19, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just posted a response to HenryLi on the administrator's page that deleted this article User:Ginkgo100 advising him what he needs to do and that the page will probably be tagged for deletion when it is undeleted.Balloonman 16:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you are raising such a fuss. Can't you find a single reference to these people anywhere? If you can't, then they aren't notable. If you can, it would be easier and faster to just recreate the article and add the reference.Kww 17:39, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re-creation of 2the Max[edit]

~~Re-creating 2the Max, while it is being diecussed on Deletion review, a discussion in which you participated, is IMO a very poor idea. Please don't do such a thing in future.~~ DES ^(talk) 04:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My error, i didn't see that the deleting admin had undeleted. My apologies. DES ^(talk) 04:56, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let me make this perfectly clear[edit]

Henry, I reviewed your article. I reviewed it again after you got it recreated, I reviewed again after you have edited it. Now, it only marginally good enough to keep. If you had put half the effort into correcting the article that you have into whining about its deletion, it might be a good article. Right now, it isn't. Stop accusing me of doing bad things, and just fix your article until it is worthy of inclusion. Next time you create an article, worry about its quality before you create it, and you won't have these difficulties.Kww 01:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. User talk:Kww#Re:Let me make this perfectly clear. — HenryLi (Talk) 05:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try one more time. There is nothing wrong with speedy deletion. Speedy deletion is essential. I mark articles for it properly. I mark them often. Of course I get in disputes, because people that write bad articles don't like to admit that they have written bad articles. Kww 10:49, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied.

Kwai Tsing Bridge[edit]

Can you provide the source, picture or citation that there are two artificial islands to the south of the pillars of the bridge? Qaka 08:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gotta be quick. It will be useful to the latest debate at Talk:List of artificial islands. Qaka 19:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Cantonese Reference:Index[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Talk:Cantonese Reference:Index, by Hydrogen Iodide (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Talk:Cantonese Reference:Index fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

This is a talk page of an article that does not exist.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Talk:Cantonese Reference:Index, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:FEUS[edit]

Template:FEUS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. master son^{T - C} 23:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of John Pond Ordway[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on John Pond Ordway, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because John Pond Ordway seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting John Pond Ordway, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 15:33, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gilman's Bazaar[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Gilman's Bazaar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Thomjakobsen 21:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gilman Street[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Gilman Street, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Thomjakobsen 21:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jockey Club Kau Sai Chau Public Golf Course[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Jockey Club Kau Sai Chau Public Golf Course, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. B. Wolterding 18:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kowloon Bowling Green Club[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Kowloon Bowling Green Club, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 09:36, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Morrison Hill[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Morrison Hill, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 09:37, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CNEC Lui Ming Choi Primary School[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article CNEC Lui Ming Choi Primary School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. B. Wolterding 16:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sheng Kung Hui Tsing Yi Chu Yan Primary School[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sheng Kung Hui Tsing Yi Chu Yan Primary School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. B. Wolterding 16:35, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sheng Kung Hui Tsing Yi Estate Ho Chak Wan Primary School[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sheng Kung Hui Tsing Yi Estate Ho Chak Wan Primary School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. B. Wolterding 16:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sheng Kung Hui Ho Chak Wan Primary School[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sheng Kung Hui Ho Chak Wan Primary School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. B. Wolterding 16:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Po Leung Kuk Chan Yat Primary School[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Po Leung Kuk Chan Yat Primary School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. B. Wolterding 16:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AWB Bug:Crash when initialization[edit]

Waiting for your input... Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Bugs#Crash_when_initialization

Is it still happening?

—Reedy Boy 21:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

looking for quote: shift in trends in science[edit]

Good day. This is unrelated to wikipedia. I was looking for some quote (?) in English, but I couldn't find it with google. It says that any shift in scientific (or mathematical) trend occurs through the new generation replacing the old-and-dying out one. Hillgentleman (talk) 19:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aomen[edit]

hi, I dunno if you had enough of reverting his edits or not....but I have and complained about him here. Your comments are appreciated if you feel you want to say something. Dengero (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 14:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

貢丸[edit]

Hi, you just removed 貢丸 from Beef ball but did not mention whether we have an article on 貢丸. It's best if you create that article before removing that text from the article. Badagnani (talk) 03:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. — HenryLi (Talk) 04:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you know it's not the same thing, clearly you do know enough to begin a short article (and I think you're able to search in Google in the Chinese language to find sources). Removing it (and not making a discussion posting noting that an article needs to be made) wasn't the right thing to do. Lack of time isn't a good answer either, as it would probably take about 15 minutes to make a basic article. Badagnani (talk) 04:19, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied — HenryLi (Talk) 04:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's always better to post such messages before simply removing something, as work needs to be done. Work has been done -- see Pork ball. Please fix as necessary. Badagnani (talk) 04:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Silver Bauhinia Star[edit]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Silver Bauhinia Star, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chet Lam[edit]

Hi, HenryLi! Thanks for your help! So if I understand correctly, on the Chet Lam article, Lam is his patronymic, right? And that's the name we should be using in the article, as in "Lam studied at... Lam grew up..." etc? Would you reply an the article's talk page? Thanks!! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 15:55, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gweilo[edit]

I noticed you had twice previously reverted HKYAN's removal of text on the Gweilo page. I just wanted to let you know that he reverted your revert again. His change stayed on the page for several days before I noticed it, but I've restored the text again. I wanted to let you know so that you can keep an eye on the page in case he does it again. —Umofomia (talk) 23:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ch'ien Mu[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ch'ien Mu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —BradV 15:38, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Fa Pao[edit]

I have nominated Fa Pao, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fa Pao. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fa Pao[edit]

With the sources you've provided at Fa Pao, you might want to consider moving it to a page on Tin Hau Festival instead. I would think the festival is more notable than a tower used there. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hong Kong Chief Commissioner[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hong Kong Chief Commissioner, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nsk92 (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:SCGawBadge.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SCGawBadge.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:55, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Clement Kong Hak-moon[edit]

A tag has been placed on Clement Kong Hak-moon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Scott Mac (Doc) 13:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Logo TWGHs.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo TWGHs.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Telecommunications industry in Hong Kong[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Telecommunications industry in Hong Kong, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article seems to consists largely or unverified original research and relies on a single source for reference that is somewhat difficult to fact check. Article also fails WP:NPOV and little effort has been made to rectify this.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. magnius (talk) 15:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Christina Chan[edit]

I have nominated Christina Chan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Chan (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Donnie Park (talk) 21:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Greenfield Garden[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Greenfield Garden, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

tagged with reference concerns for 2+ years. lacks coverage in 3rd party sources.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 14:37, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Northeast Asia[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Northeast Asia, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northeast Asia. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

You edited this article a long time ago, so I am inviting you to take part in the AfD Thegreyanomaly (talk) 00:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you changed the changes I made to article "B", which is wrong. i don't know if you are an elitist who doesn't like slang in wikipedia or mistakenly thought the entry was racist because of the words ethnic roots. there is a note on the chat section of the page by someone saying "my friends always ask me what this means", so people have heard this slang and are using wikipedia to find a definition, which they won't find if you remove it, so please leave it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatguyzilla (talk • contribs) 18:31, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PROD notice[edit]

Proposed deletion of Robinson Road, Michigan[edit]

The article Robinson Road, Michigan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

completely unreferenced, doesn't assert notability beyond it's history as a purely local road

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi1979 (talk) 10:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Operation Yellowbird[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Operation Yellowbird, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Tvtr (talk) 01:52, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello HenryLi! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,198 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Quah Chow Cheung - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling[edit]

Hi, long ago you moved Convention of Chuanbi from the pinyin spelling ("Chuanbi") to the "historical term". The British originally spelt 穿鼻 as "Chuenpee", but I moved it back to the pinyin because I thought it was pronounced like that at the time, but now I have doubts. Do you know if the Cantonese and Mandarin accent pronounces the word 穿鼻 in the same way or is one closer to the British spelling than the other? I've read that much of the early romanisation was based on the Cantonese dialect and I'm wondering if this is the case here. Spellcast (talk) 07:16, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. (User talk:Spellcast#Re: Spelling) — HenryLi (Talk) 17:36, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robinson Road (Michigan) for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Robinson Road (Michigan), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robinson Road (Michigan) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Imzadi 1979 → 22:49, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Scout Association of Hong Kong.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scout Association of Hong Kong.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGa^talk 18:47, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Simplifications to written Chinese in Hong Kong for deletion[edit]

The article Simplifications to written Chinese in Hong Kong is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simplifications to written Chinese in Hong Kong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Laurent (talk) 14:01, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dundas Street, Hong Kong for deletion[edit]

The article Dundas Street, Hong Kong is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dundas Street, Hong Kong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 02:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wellington Barracks[edit]

A tag has been placed on Wellington Barracks, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

the London barracks are far better known and the Hong Kong ones no longer exist, so it makes sense to move the London article back here

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Green Giant (talk) 10:02, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject on Hong Kong Football(Invitation)[edit]

Hello HenryLi.

Given your interest in Hong Kong football related articles, you are cordially invited to participate in the Hong Kong football task force, a project dedicated on improving Wikipedia's coverage and detail regarding Hong Kong football articles.
If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see to-do list section that you can help with.
Please note that the WikiProject pages are not fully edited. Please help to edit it and its subpages. Thank you.

本人在維基百科(英文版)中看到閣下對香港足球有濃厚的興趣，現誠意邀請您加入維基專題 - 香港足球(WikiProject on Hong Kong football，以提高香港足球文章的覆蓋率及文章的質素。
如閣下希望加入此項目，您可蒞臨專題主頁(Project page)。您可以在該頁面註冊加入，並可到待辦事項(to-do list)查詢您可以幫助的條目，甚至在該處新加入其他人可幫助的條目。

閣下需注意一點：該項目頁面並未完全修編。請幫忙編輯該頁及其子頁面。謝謝。

Thanks.Fabregas0414 (talk) 16:00, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Smithfield, Hong Kong for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smithfield, Hong Kong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smithfield, Hong Kong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 03:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of School Administrative and Management Systems[edit]

The article School Administrative and Management Systems has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An administrative software for Hong Kong schools that fails WP:N with no claims of notability. Unable to find independent WP:RS as internet search in English, Chinese and its common abbreviation did not turn up anything with significant coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michaela den (talk) 10:12, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you, I appreciate your help. And about "Yue Chinese", I was simply referring to it by what the English Wikipedia language article lists it as. If you feel they won't like this, I can change it to Cantonese. — Moe ε 18:49, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Thanks for explaining, I see that now that I review the en Wikipedia article on Cantonese. Let's just hope I don't run into these problems on other languages. :) — Moe ε 20:10, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:CheungChingEstateMap.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CheungChingEstateMap.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:22, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Silvercord for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silvercord is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silvercord until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 15:50, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categorisation of Macau and Hong Kong[edit]

Can you help look into the following problem? From what I observed, many Hong Kong and Macau categories are subcats of the corresponding by-country parent categories (by their status of dependencies), and are subcats of the corresponding China or PRC categories with a <spacebar>Macau or <spacebar>Hong Kong catsort (in some cases an asterisk is used instead in place of the <spacebar> tho). But when I apply it to other categories, SchmuckyTheCat (talk · contribs) undid them en masse. Please response at WP talk:Categorisation. 218.250.159.25 (talk) 20:37, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scouting and guiding[edit]

Henry are you a scout? Do you want to take a look at the fiasco with Scouting and Guiding in Mainland China?[11] Please give a hand if possible. 119.237.206.135 (talk) 17:05, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Queensway origin[edit]

Hi. I know you were involved in the creation of the Queensway page, and I've been working on it. In particular, I'm concerned that we have no reference for the statement that it was split from Queen's Road East in 1967. In fact I've found possible evidence to the contrary. I'd much appreciate your views at the Queensway Talk page. Onanoff (talk) 06:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article review[edit]

I have nominated Scout Association of Hong Kong for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 18:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PROD Better Health for a Better Hong Kong[edit]

Proposed deletion of Better Health for a Better Hong Kong[edit]

The article Better Health for a Better Hong Kong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this organisation/project meets the notability criteria. All the coverage I can find is minor

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. (nominating editor: Phantomsteve (talk · contribs), don't blame me.) Der yck C. 19:41, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harlech Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Peak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese in the Court of Final Appeal (Macau) page[edit]

Por favor não contribua com textos em português na Wikipedia em inglês. Entretanto, suas contribuições serão muito bem-vindas na Wikipédia em português.

Please do not contribute text in Portuguese to English Wikipedia. Your contributions are more than welcome at the Portuguese Wikipedia.

Speedy deletion nomination of St. Thomas the Apostle Church[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on St. Thomas the Apostle Church requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mootros (talk) 11:30, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of St. Thomas the Apostle Church[edit]

The article St. Thomas the Apostle Church has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable church. A7 declined as I feel the subject is the building not the congregation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peridon (talk) 13:10, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cochrane Street, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tai Ping Shan and Royal Naval (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:57, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Sha Tin Heights Tunnel[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sha Tin Heights Tunnel, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk) 16:13, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joint Street[edit]

The article Joint Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Short non-notable local street. Unreferenced since April 2007. Does not establish its notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Admr Boltz 14:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tsing Yi Public School[edit]

The article Tsing Yi Public School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable at all. No chances to survive an AfD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 18:34, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rambler Crest[edit]

The article Rambler Crest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as not notable since 5 years. Also 5 years with only one (self) source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 15:59, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kimberley Street[edit]

The article Kimberley Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficent sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. Rincewind42 (talk) 08:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 08:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jordan Road, Hong Kong for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan Road, Hong Kong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Road, Hong Kong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rincewind42 (talk) 08:27, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Airport Road, Hong Kong[edit]

The article Airport Road, Hong Kong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 08:28, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tai O Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tai O Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tai O Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rincewind42 (talk) 08:35, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of South Lantau Road[edit]

The article South Lantau Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 08:48, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tsing Yi Heung Sze Wui Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tsing Yi Heung Sze Wui Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsing Yi Heung Sze Wui Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rincewind42 (talk) 09:13, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tsuen Wan Road[edit]

The article Tsuen Wan Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 09:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Austin Road[edit]

The article Austin Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hankow Road[edit]

The article Hankow Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:27, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Haiphong Road[edit]

The article Haiphong Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:27, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gascoigne Road[edit]

The article Gascoigne Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:28, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ferry Street, Hong Kong[edit]

The article Ferry Street, Hong Kong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:28, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fa Yuen Street[edit]

The article Fa Yuen Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:30, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cheung Sha Wan Road[edit]

The article Cheung Sha Wan Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:33, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Airport Road, Hong Kong for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Airport Road, Hong Kong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airport Road, Hong Kong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rincewind42 (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Middle Road, Hong Kong[edit]

The article Middle Road, Hong Kong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic. Wikipedia is not a directory of places or tourist guide book. This article would be better suited to WikiVoyage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 02:40, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peking Road[edit]

The article Peking Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic. Wikipedia is not a directory of places or tourist guide book. This article would be better suited to WikiVoyage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 02:40, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prince Edward Road[edit]

The article Prince Edward Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic. Wikipedia is not a directory of places or tourist guide book. This article would be better suited to WikiVoyage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 02:40, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Public Square Street[edit]

The article Public Square Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic. Wikipedia is not a directory of places or tourist guide book. This article would be better suited to WikiVoyage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 02:40, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Reclamation Street[edit]

The article Reclamation Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic. Wikipedia is not a directory of places or tourist guide book. This article would be better suited to WikiVoyage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 02:40, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tai Wan Road[edit]

The article Tai Wan Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic. Wikipedia is not a directory of places or tourist guide book. This article would be better suited to WikiVoyage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tung Choi Street[edit]

The article Tung Choi Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic. Wikipedia is not a directory of places or tourist guide book. Though the article cites one source, that source is only briefly mentions Ladies' Market and does not mention Tung Choi Street. Ladies' Market may be notable but that doesn't mean the street address becomes notable. This article would be better suited to WikiVoyage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:46, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yen Chow Street[edit]

The article Yen Chow Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic. Wikipedia is not a directory of places or tourist guide book. This article would be better suited to WikiVoyage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:46, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sham Mong Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sham Mong Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sham Mong Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:50, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gascoigne Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gascoigne Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gascoigne Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rincewind42 (talk) 00:08, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Austin Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Austin Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rincewind42 (talk) 00:20, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of South Lantau Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South Lantau Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Lantau Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rincewind42 (talk) 00:26, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tung Choi Street for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tung Choi Street is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tung Choi Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rincewind42 (talk) 08:05, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tai Wan Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tai Wan Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tai Wan Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rincewind42 (talk) 08:36, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peking Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peking Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peking Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rincewind42 (talk) 08:49, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hong Kong 1981 riots for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hong Kong 1981 riots is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong 1981 riots until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 09:28, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo TWGHs.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo TWGHs.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:15, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scout Path for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scout Path is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scout Path until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FallingGravity (talk) 23:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coffin home[edit]

The article Coffin home has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for over nine years, fails WP:V.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 13:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hong Kong Internet BBS for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hong Kong Internet BBS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong Internet BBS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 21:37, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:La Salle College has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:La Salle College, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, HenryLi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hong Kong oyster, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pearl River and Brian Morton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tung Wah Group of Hospitals S. C. Gaw Memorial College for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tung Wah Group of Hospitals S. C. Gaw Memorial College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tung Wah Group of Hospitals S. C. Gaw Memorial College until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Deli nk (talk) 17:10, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Coffin home for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coffin home is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coffin home (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:39, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, HenryLi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, HenryLi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed[edit]

Hello HenryLi! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:09, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Metro Sham Shui[edit]

The article Metro Sham Shui has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:42, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Firebird BBS[edit]

The article Firebird BBS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maple BBS[edit]

The article Maple BBS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Action Pack (comics) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Action Pack (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action Pack (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 01:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Wharf Logo.jpg[edit]

The file File:Wharf Logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Staveley Street for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Staveley Street is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staveley Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 20:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for taking the time to improve the page Comme des Garçons ‎since I've also seen some promotional language and some alterations that needed to be done in that article. EraKook (talk) 10:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rambler Crest for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rambler Crest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rambler Crest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 13:52, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Container Terminal 9 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Container Terminal 9, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Container Terminal 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wharf Road[edit]

The article Wharf Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 21:13, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lai Chi Kok Road[edit]

The article Lai Chi Kok Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 21:23, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lai Chi Kok Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lai Chi Kok Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lai Chi Kok Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 22:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fei Ngo Shan Road[edit]

The article Fei Ngo Shan Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GEOROAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 22:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MacDonnell Road[edit]

The article MacDonnell Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, does not pass WP:GEOROAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 23:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marsh Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marsh Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marsh Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 23:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Middle Road, Hong Kong for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Middle Road, Hong Kong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle Road, Hong Kong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 23:26, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Public Square Street for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Public Square Street is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public Square Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 23:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fei Ngo Shan Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fei Ngo Shan Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fei Ngo Shan Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 02:59, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MacDonnell Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MacDonnell Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacDonnell Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 03:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MacDonnell Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MacDonnell Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacDonnell Road (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Stifle (talk) 14:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Urban Renewal Authority (Hong Kong) logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Urban Renewal Authority (Hong Kong) logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaJaWa |hello 05:41, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tsing Yi Fishermen's Children's Primary School for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tsing Yi Fishermen's Children's Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsing Yi Fishermen's Children's Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Imcdc (talk) 03:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Easeful Court for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Easeful Court is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easeful Court until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:10, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Fei Ngo Shan Road" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Fei Ngo Shan Road and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 28#Fei Ngo Shan Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:38, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Louie Castro moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Louie Castro, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:09, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ngau Kok Wan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ngau Kok Wan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ngau Kok Wan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 11:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sham Mong Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sham Mong Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sham Mong Road (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 11:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2the Max for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2the Max is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2the Max (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 11:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Causeway Road[edit]

The article Causeway Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

tagged as uncited in 2007

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:41, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Special forces of Hong Kong[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Special forces of Hong Kong indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:59, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Ho King Toi" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Ho King Toi has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 15 § Ho King Toi until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Rutland Quadrant" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Rutland Quadrant has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 15 § Rutland Quadrant until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Railway Approach" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Railway Approach has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 15 § Railway Approach until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Current events[edit]

Chinese names[edit]

lit.[edit]

Hakka : I [ŋai11][edit]

The map for UC and RC[edit]

Map for Kwai Tsing District constituencies[edit]

Double redirects[edit]

List of Hong Kong-related topics[edit]

Tartan track[edit]

New stub types[edit]

SYS FARC[edit]

Thirteen Factories[edit]

Sir Henry Pottinger[edit]

Punti-Hakka Clan Wars[edit]

Kung hei fat choi[edit]

After turning into a disambiguation..[edit]

Preview, please[edit]

Huaiwei[edit]

Pronunciation in English[edit]

Unidentified image[edit]

Scouting in Mainland China[edit]

Water resource references for Hong Kong[edit]

Edit summary[edit]

Site of Special Scientifc Interest[edit]

Geographic references changes on 25 February 2006[edit]

Tai O Road[edit]

Re: The map about Central and Western District of Hong Kong[edit]

Chinese Wikimedia Conference 2006[edit]

Pyinmana / Naypyidaw[edit]

Ngau Tau Kok[edit]

Brook Bernacchi[edit]

Middle Chinese[edit]

Chinese naming conventions[edit]

SCMP[edit]

Barnstar[edit]

Standard Cantonese[edit]

About Yuen Long[edit]

Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion[edit]

Hong Kong, China[edit]

only telling something[edit]

Image:Chau_Tsai.png[edit]

Image:Busy Yuen Long Town.jpg[edit]

Request for edit summary[edit]

Sheng Kung Hui[edit]

WikiProject Piers[edit]

Template:Hong Kong (PRC)[edit]

Current events in Hong Kong and Macao[edit]

GCCS[edit]

Frederick Stewart[edit]

say hi from c_o[edit]

1st Preliminary meeting of Wikimedia Hong Kong[edit]

Housing estates in Hong Kong[edit]

AfD nomination of Broadview Garden, Serene Garden and Ching Nga Court[edit]

WikiProject Hong Kong[edit]

Category:Lighthouses in Bermuda[edit]

Category:Lighthouses in Hong Kong[edit]

A bug with your AWB?[edit]

Li Move[edit]

Notability of International Christian School[edit]

Regarding International Christian School[edit]

James Dyer Ball[edit]

non-commercial use only[edit]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AsiaWorld-Expo.png)[edit]

Notability of 2the Max[edit]

Can't undelete[edit]

Re-creation of 2the Max[edit]

Let me make this perfectly clear[edit]

Kwai Tsing Bridge[edit]

Talk:Cantonese Reference:Index[edit]

TfD nomination of Template:FEUS[edit]

Notability of John Pond Ordway[edit]

Gilman's Bazaar[edit]

Gilman Street[edit]

Jockey Club Kau Sai Chau Public Golf Course[edit]

Kowloon Bowling Green Club[edit]

Morrison Hill[edit]

CNEC Lui Ming Choi Primary School[edit]

Sheng Kung Hui Tsing Yi Chu Yan Primary School[edit]

Sheng Kung Hui Tsing Yi Estate Ho Chak Wan Primary School[edit]

Sheng Kung Hui Ho Chak Wan Primary School[edit]

Hakka : I [ŋai₁₁][edit]