Talk:Bede

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBede has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 26, 2006Good article nomineeListed
July 16, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
August 1, 2013Good article reassessmentKept
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 26, 2018.
Current status: Good article

Additional source for date of declaration of becoming Doctor of the Church[edit]

Because the reference that is now listed (Bede#CITEREFCampbell2004) is only accessible with a subscription and also doesn't actually give itself a source, it might be advisable to add the actual decret. But because I have no idea how to properly adhere to Wikipedia's rules about formating references in this case, I'd ask someone else to do it, please:

Acta Sanctae Sedis XXXII, 1899-1900, p. 338-339 (can be accessed here https://www.vatican.va/archive/ass/index_en.htm, were). It's in Latin, though 141.13.230.1 (talk) 01:07, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added it. Dudley Miles (talk) 09:15, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Length of the year[edit]

World Almanac issues from the 1970s and 1980s state that the Venerable Bede announced in AD 730 that the year was too long (11 minutes 14 seconds excess - the actual year length being 365 days, 5 hours, 48 minutes, 46 seconds), though nothing was done about it until 1582, by which time the error was estimated to amount to 10 days. There does not seem to be anything about it in the article. GBC (talk) 06:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation[edit]

We give "beed" as the only pronunciation but it is not even the correct pronunciation of his name, which is more like "beda", even if spelled as "bede". AFAIK, it's not until (late) Middle English that "bede" would be pronounced "beed", but I am not sure when that spelling came about. Seems to me like it was merely another way to spell a schwa at the end. "Beda" is used sometimes as a spelling today in fact (schools named after him). Is there some better way we can handle this so people see right in the first part of the lead what the correct pronunciation of the name is? —DIYeditor (talk) 18:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To me this would be analogous to Goethe's pronunciation being given as "gewth", or Gödel's given as "gohdel", or Nietzsche given as "neechee". Surely, people do often pronounce them that way in English, but that is not how those names are properly pronounced. (Modern) English speakers may not be able to get those names exactly right, but equally well we shouldn't give a completely wrong pronunciation just because many people say it that way. Of course, we need to go by reliable sources. I am open to any solution to this which would put the correct Anglo-Saxon pronunciation closer to the beginning of the lead (or lede if you will). —DIYeditor (talk) 03:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Err, according to MOS:LEAD "In Wikipedia, the lead section is an introduction to an article and a summary of its most important contents. It is located at the beginning of the article, before the table of contents and the first heading. It is not a news-style lead or "lede" paragraph."
Back to Bede, when reading Middle- or Old-English I was taught to pronounce every letter. If the scribe made the effort to write it then he did so because it is needed. For instance words like þone have to be pronounced "thonuh" (short o) to accommodate the metre of poems such as Beowulf. I've never seen Bede's name in a poem, but would agree that DIYeditor is probably right, it is bi-syllabic and my personal guess (ie not RS) is bed-ah. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 08:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pic in infobox[edit]

I think the medieval depiction looks far worse than the modern one and is just not nearly as good for the first image people see, especially when both depictions are imaginary. Does anyone agree/disagree? SaturatedFatts (talk) 02:26, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the medieval one is fine, even though it's not contemporary. It's probably not far from what a contemporary depiction would have been. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 03:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I like the current picture. Which modern one do you mean? —DIYeditor (talk) 03:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This was the original lead image, which I moved further down in the article to the section on Bede's works. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 10:09, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]