Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultanpunk

Sultanpunk

Three hits on google, two from the page of the guy who coined the term, and the other a proclamation about that site's existence. Personally I find it kind of interesting but there doesn't seem to be any sort of notability whatsoever. Sarge Baldy 02:06, Oct 15, 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. 3 Google hits: isn't this a speedy candidate? You know, I have, on occasion, made up my own words, but I don't go around adding them to Wikipedia. This whole situation is sultanpunkulicious. Let's just Geogreify this one, with extreme prejudicity. func(talk) 02:23, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • I would have speedily deleted it but it doesn't seem to meet a single criteria. Sarge Baldy 02:25, Oct 15, 2004 (UTC)
    • I was actually just looking for a good excuse to make up words.... ;-) func(talk) 02:34, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete- as much as I enjoy the field of Fakeworditology, this is just not worthy. Barneyboo 02:42, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete that sucker. Kill it! KILL! Erm, yeah. Tim McCormack 04:08, 2004 Oct 15 (UTC)
• Delete. utcursch 11:54, Oct 15, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: I'm a verb! I'm a verb! Help, I'm a cop! Help, I'm a cop! (Neologism of no standing.) Geogre 13:55, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • In truth, to "Geogreify" should mean to come up with a brilliant policy that gets voted down, (and for all the wrong reasons) :( func(talk) 23:26, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. I'm very concerned that most Wikipedia members here are not actually researching the claims proposed by the submitter of each VfD and just taking what they writeup at face value. This is evident based on many of the candidates I've reviewed today and their slanted nature. Clearly, this is not one of those instances; I've voted for Delete. Radman1 14:50, 18 Oct 2004 (PST)